- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
When a jump is overall good, but UR, I don't think that the GOE should be negative. A few examples:
Cesario's 3Lo and 3S: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmWjic85sUs
Liza's 3Lo (3:47): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wta2ifZiMcA
Dai's 3F (4:06): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64QdXaZsUxs
They're excellent jumps, with good height, landing position, flow and speed, steps before (and sometimes after) them, that fit the musical structure... But they're <. I think that, in cases like these, the BV should be lower because of the <, but the GOEs should be positive (+1 and +2), if there are no evident mistakes in the jump... Obviously, when a jumps is << (or <) and there's an evident and visible cheat in the landing, the GOE should be negative.
What do you think?
Cesario's 3Lo and 3S: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmWjic85sUs
Liza's 3Lo (3:47): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wta2ifZiMcA
Dai's 3F (4:06): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64QdXaZsUxs
They're excellent jumps, with good height, landing position, flow and speed, steps before (and sometimes after) them, that fit the musical structure... But they're <. I think that, in cases like these, the BV should be lower because of the <, but the GOEs should be positive (+1 and +2), if there are no evident mistakes in the jump... Obviously, when a jumps is << (or <) and there's an evident and visible cheat in the landing, the GOE should be negative.
What do you think?