- Joined
- Jul 11, 2003
Cheers for Irina. A well deserved 1st place.
Joe
Joe
kyla2 said:Believe me, no one is arguing that she isn't a wonderful and gernerous daughter or that she didn't deserve her World Championship Gold: she certainly did. I am happy she won the money to help her Mom and her comeback was brilliant. But having said all that, her program was not one for the ages from any perspective.
IMO, Irina's free skate rates a great big YES! for power, speed, joy, AND artistry. A different kind of artistry than Michelle's programs--pick your favorite(s)--to be sure, but artistry nonetheless.kyla2 said:Power, speed, joy-yes; artistry no. I am glad she won the money to help her mother. She's a wonderful daughter, and a fine, gifted and hard working athletic skater. That's the beginning and end of it for me. This was no Lyra Angelica.
I wanted to say something like this, but your words are even better. ITA!Rgirl said:IMO, Irina's free skate rates a great big YES! for power, speed, joy, AND artistry. A different kind of artistry than Michelle's programs--pick your favorite(s)--to be sure, but artistry nonetheless.
For me it's like comparing a painting by Renoir and one by Jackson Pollack. Or if you want to compare those of the same time period, Pollack and Edward Hopper, i.e., "Night Hawks."
Irina's artistry, IMO, comes from the force of her personality joining with her physicality to create a program that moves me in its total expression of the joy of what she can do physically, on ice, to music. Michelle's artistry is more traditional and perhaps fits the idea of artistry for more people, especially in the programs she did chorographed by Lori Nichol.
For me there is artistry in both approaches. In fact, I used to find it more often in Irina's skating separate from the choreography and in Michelle's choreography separate from her skating. However, when Michelle's skating took a quantum leap, IMO, in her '02/03 "Aranjuez" season, I hoped I would see it in both her skating and choreography. Ironically, now that I'm captivated by the way Michelle skates--her missteps at these Worlds notwithstanding--I don't feel she has yet found a vehicle to express it, that is, a piece of choreography, equal to most of those created for her by Lori Nichol.
OTOH, now that Irina has gotten away from ballet and opera music, I feel the choreography she is using has improved, though it's still not her strong suit. Irina's choreography is usually weaker than Michelle's--sometimes by miles--but Irina has had some gorgeous choreography she's performed magnificently for pro-am competitions, such as "Schindler's List," which often went unnoticed because they were performed at "cheesefests" and only broadcast once in the US.
But the question here, as I understand it, concerns Irina's free program at these '05 Worlds. For me her FP met all the criteria for a "skate for the ages" with artistry to boot. I feel that way regardless of the health problems of Irina or her mother. The latter issues make for a memorable story surrounding Irina's skate, but, at least for me, it doesn't affect how I feel about Irina's FS in and of itself. JMO.
Rgirl
We're in complete agreement on that one, Joe! It's not easy to get artistry and artistry in one package.Joesitz said:....Not easy to get sport and artistry in one package.
Joe