It is true that the results remind a lotery sometimes.
I (may be some other people also) experienced an inverse to what CaroLiza_fan told. Due to the unstable HanYan conditions, I did not include him into initial top 5. Then, listening the reports about his successful trainings, at the last moment promoted him instead of Menshov. The result was a loss. Conclusion is the same: more information dos not necessarily helps.
My only success in this game is a good standing at Dance, which I don't follow at all. This, again, is not a good sign for the game rules (and to the great extent - for ISU).
For the excessive(?) randomness, our rules should be partially blamed, IMHO. The 4th-5th places are really random while they are taken into account as seriously as the podium. Let me wish that our great minds organizing the game would consider some changes next time (still keeping the game easy to score).
Thanks for your note. There seems to be this view point that the podium should be worth more, which was expressed early in the game organization. I took that into account and the conclusion I came to is that arguably there just as much skill in predicting 4th or 5th place as there is in predicting the podium. And the podium can be just as random this season. Let's consider the fact that only THREE people have medaled at both their GPs this season.
FWIW, the men has always been a crapshoot because you have a number of men who have very close scoring ability/potential. And even the "gimmes" aren't always that way. Patrick Chan losing to Javier Fernandez at Skate Canada in 2012, for example.