I don't understand why people have to pick sides.
Evgenia should be praised more for her courage to try something different, this is huge: a russian skater working abroad with a canadian coach, you don't really see it. On the other hand Eteri is right to be pissed by how things went, with two of her biggest skaters going to rival coaches.
We'll see how this translates on ice, at Skate Canada we have already Medvedeva, Tursynbaeva and Panenkova all there.
Tolstoy we are much of the same mind on this one. Why are sides needed?
And as you know I have long admired Zhenya's potential and quirky personality.
Yet, I've been someone who was frustrated that, success in competition aside, some of Zhenya's technical development was sacrificed to maximize a strategy based on last quadrennial's IJS scoring.
So, TCC or not, I hope she can reach her own goals in improving her spins and jumps.
I don't agree that coaches own skaters though. I find that a bad attitude for a coach. It's not disrespectful to see that your coach is no longer the best fit for you. Certainly, Eteri drops skaters when they aren't a good fit for her vision and program.
'Coaching diplomacy' is all the more difficult when a skater has spent most of their developmental years with a coach. Saying goodbye and making an adult decision is very hard to do without hard feelings.
But maternal/paternal coaching relationship or not, it's the skaters' parents and not the coaches who will be there for their kids when they retire and they face the long term physical and mental health impacts of their training.
So, let's stipulate that, from a Russian cultural perspective, it wasn't the most gracious exit possible. Publicly thanking Eteri, but not doing it in person is problematic.
That said, such a dramatic public reaction from Eteri creates a situation where a thank you with flowers becomes an apology with flowers.
So, it could be a long time before they can reconcile.
But, do we really need to keep this going here?