- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
So two stories from one source and one author where she’s a “goth ballerina,” two more stories from one other source where she “emotes like a mime, [and] has a bit more flair,” (high praise, that) and in which they quote Johnny thinking her short program was breathtaking, and neither from a particularly mainstream source in the first place. Not exactly a wide-reaching narrative of her fantastic artistry, and more about her personality traits, anyway.Examples: https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/2/22/17040376/evgenia-medvedeva-olympics-figure-skating
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/21/17035810/zagitova-medvedeva-olympics-figure-skating
https://slate.com/culture/2018/02/e...st-skater-and-she-loves-dancing-in-malls.html
https://slate.com/culture/2018/02/t...ssence-of-a-sport-thats-not-just-a-sport.html
See also: NYT, WaPo, etc. Especially after Zagitova won and it was framed as Lipinski/
-Kwan 2.0.
If you follow skating at all, you’re not in the group susceptible to this narrative, since you know how the scoring works. It’s people who saw Mesvedeva for the first time at the team event who were told: “Medvedeva is older and has the artistry, but Zagitova has all her jumps in the backhalf and the most difficult combo and the Olympics loves to reward younger competitors with technical firepower.” Every casual skating viewer I knew was parroting some version of this story. (It’s why my doctor correctly guessed Zagitova would win, actually.)
And half the articles touch on her rivalry with Zagitova. Everyone does love a good rivalry. I do agree that most people I saw afterwards agreed Med was the more artistic of the two, but that’s the key: of the two of them. I also have to say, just anecdotally, that of those I saw discussing it after the fact were more than casual viewers.
or do they change the name of the work?

