I don't know what "that" is, but I don't think so. It means that adult journalists, which presumably Phil is, will know the difference between a 16 year old child and a 27 year old adult and ask appropriate questions. Otherwise they risk looking like the horse's patootie that Phil did with this question ETA: to Adam (for entirely different reasons than the child/adult dynamic).
My "that" referred to everything that was said in the preceding post. And I am confused: If your point is that interviewers should act differently with a 16-year-old and a 27-year-old, why are we complaining about the treatment of the 27-year-old?
Get off your duff and make some calls, Phil.


:
joking