I remembered the lutz combo going well along with the 3A combo. It was so rare to not see those kind of air positions result in pops or falls by the skaters so because that didn't happen it just didn't seem like it become a justification of why he should have lost because there were not actual jump failures. It was really a brand new thing I had never read before it trying to justify a person losing "leans in the air" on successful jumps!
Everything matters. Bad air position means less GOE.
Since this dead horse keeps suffering, if I recall your podium was
1. Takahashi
2. Kozuka
3. Plushenko or Wier (I think you felt Wier at the time, but I also know you thought Plushenko's jump difficulty might have been enough). Correct?
My immediate reaction was that Weir deserved Bronze, but that was influenced by how poorly I thought of Plushenko after his SP that had some of the most horrible musical interpretation ever, crappy spins, and a real lack of great skating skills compared to many of the other skates. Plushenko's LP was better than my immediate reaction at the time (which was also influenced by watching the anti-Plushenko NBC coverage directly beforehand), although the program and his skating quality were definitely a shadow of his former self.
I also didn't factor in Weir's lacking SP enough at the time. I definitely still feel Weir outskated Lysacek in the LP, though, and I still feel Takhashi and Kozuka deserved the top spots at that Olympics. Their overall skating quality was the best of the competition, FAR superior to Plushenko and Lysacek, and they had the most difficult LP's.
1.
Takahashi (SP 1, LP 1) - Really screwed over by undeserved < calls and too much of a deduction on the ! calls. The fall in the LP didn't matter, he was still the best. If Patrick Chan can fall 3 times these days and still beat everyone else, then Takahashi at 2010 Olympics certainly had a 1 fall cushion over the rest of the field, with the way they skated.
2.
Kozuka (SP 7, LP 2) - Yes, his LP really is that good. A clean Quad and 3Axel-3Toe, speed, edges, and a sensitivity that suits the music really well.
3.
Plushenko (SP 3, LP 3) - He deserves a medal for skating relatively clean with the only Quad-Triple combinations of the competition. Everything else about his skating was lacking, although his innate performance ability in the LP was still better than Lysacek's and he at least had SOME musical interpretation.
4.
Lysacek (SP 2, LP 5) - Very good SP performance and such a lackluster LP performance. The jumps are small (and that second Triple Axel is just barely rotated and landed), the choreography and the interpretation especially are poor, and his skating skills are entirely average for someone at this level. He deserves 5th in the LP only because of how relatively clean it was...I'd barely put him ahead of Patrick Chan's performance that had a fall and a step-out.
5.
Weir (SP 6, LP 4) - The SP was too reserved, not enough attack (and it wasn't a great program to begin with), which resulted in a bit less quality on the technical elements too. The LP had lovely musical interpretation and flow over the ice at times (I'd have him 3rd on PCS for the LP), but obviously the difficulty wasn't there in comparison to the top 3. He should have been really close in points to Plushenko's LP, though.
6.
Chan (SP 8, LP 6) - A messy SP and I don't like his LP, but he skated it extremely well aside from the couple jump mistakes.
7.
Lambiel (SP 5, LP 7) - The worst in terms of jumps out of the top 8 at this competition and, except for the second half of his SP, he skated so nervous throughout the whole competition. His amazing spins and second footwork sequence keep him that high in the SP, but he really should have been hammered in the LP on the PCS because it was not good.
8.
Oda (SP 4, LP 8) - A technically solid, if bland, SP performance and an overly cautious LP performance (which seriously detracts from the character he is trying to play here) that becomes drastically hurt by the fall and resulting "timeout" he takes.