chuckm said:
I've always been puzzled by those who've claimed that Irina should have won the SP at SLC. In that competition, the 3 flip was supposed to be preceded by footwork, and the jump was supposed to be executed IMMEDIATELY after the footwork. Irina has always had the tendency to telegraph her jumps, and she did at SLC: she did the footwork, then paused to set up the flip---and got deducted for it. Her Bielmann spin traveled noticeably, then she finished after the music. These are the reasons why Irina didn't win the SP, and in fact, it wasn't as close as Irina claimed it was.
Michelle received 5 first place ordinals and 4 second place ordinals.
Irina received 4 first place ordinals, two second place ordinals and three THIRD place ordinals (Sasha Cohen took three 2nd place ordinals from Irina).
OK, so let's recapitulate ..... In the SLC Olympics SP, Irina has a pause between her footwork and her 3F, her Biellmann spins travel noticeably and she finishes after the music -- and she still expects to be in the lead after that?? I don't remember Michelle having any obvious mistakes in her SP, and I can understand why Sasha (despite a flutz on her 3Z-2T combination) took 3 2nd place ordinals from Irina -- Sasha had a beautifully choreographed program, and she sold it to the audiences and judges. I think it was one of the best performances in her career to date (together with her Malaguena SP at last year's worlds).
Anyway, after the results for the SP are announced, Irina does not insist that her federation lodge a protest, or accept the fact that she could have skated better. Then in the LP, she is again outskated, this time by Sarah, and she does the same thing -- blame anyone but herself for her subpar performance, only this time she is also caught on camera openly calling the judges all sorts of names. How charming. If Irina so strongly believed that she had been undermarked, then she should have insisted that her federation lodge an appeal immediately. Perhaps the officials in the Russian FSU did not agree with her? I don't think many people would dispute the fact that the final placings for the Ladies were correct, ie 1. Hughes 2. Slutskaya 3. Kwan.
Excidra2001 said:
First people bring up 00 worlds, then 01, then SLC, then whatever competition which they felt Irina was "held up" whats next? How come Irina can't have kids?
Umm, excuse me? The reason we are having this "discussion" is because Irina HERSELF brought up the subject of the SLC Olympics, when she mentioned in her post-FS interview at Euros that perhaps her latest win was to make up for "all those years when I was unfairly placed 4th, for the Olympics."
At this point, let me point out that I am no Irina-hater or Michelle/Sasha-lover. I happen to be one of those who believe that Irina deserved to win her 6th European title, despite a less-than-stellar free skate. She was head and shoulders above the rest of the competition in the SP and it was reflected in her CoP scores. As far as the LP was concerned, the TSS for Irina, Susanna and Elena were very close and the first place could have gone to any of the three ladies.
I also feel that while Michelle deserved her 9th US National title, there was no way she should have been given 5.8s and 5.9s for technical merit and 4 6.0s for presentation in her LP. I would have given her 5.7 for the first mark and either 5.8 or 5.9 for the second.
This is a general figure skating forum, and no skater is above criticism. Not even Irina. So, Excidra2001, if you cannot bear to see your beloved Irina being criticized, then I suggest you refrain yourself from participating any further in this thread.