- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
I think it wasn`t fair that Johnny`s PCS marks were lower than Lysacek, Plushenko, Lambiel, Chan, Takahashi and Abbott. Why? The answer for this question - because he was only the 3 number of the US team and US federation didn`t work for him.
And doesn`t anybody who writes or speaks about the Johnny`s and Lysacek`s jumps in OG see that their jumps ( and everything) were equal exept Lysacek`s 2Lo instead Johnny`s 2T?
So if Johnny was the first number of the US team and the marks were fair Johnny should be on the Olimpic podium.
( Everybody who saw the US Champ 2010 understood why Johnny was only the 3 number of the US team. They didn`t want him in the Olimpic team at all).
And doesn`t anybody who writes or speaks about the Johnny`s and Lysacek`s jumps in OG see that their jumps ( and everything) were equal exept Lysacek`s 2Lo instead Johnny`s 2T?
So if Johnny was the first number of the US team and the marks were fair Johnny should be on the Olimpic podium.
( Everybody who saw the US Champ 2010 understood why Johnny was only the 3 number of the US team. They didn`t want him in the Olimpic team at all).



I can guarantee you it was a massacre, still counting casualties
Oh my.