So what does Patrick Chan need to do to pull his Transition scores up the the level of Lysacek's andf Joubert's (and Verner's).
According to the protocols, Chan was tied in this score with Verner and behind the other two.
Is this something for Patrick to work on for next season?
This is a general problem. This is not the ISU and Brian Joubert against Patrick Chan. I for one think that compared to Kozuka, Chan had not as many transitions in his program. Kozuka got half a mark less on transitions.
It's actually good that Chan brought the whole thing up - but perhaps he could do it with some maturity next time and not by yelling "Give Joubert less points, give Joubert less points!" like some brat at school who wants to see his classmate punished.
PCS is a placeholder, that's obvious. It's a mixture of a reputation score and an emotional impact score - it's simply like the second score back in 6.0 days. It has nothing to do with transitions, choreography etc.
My question is - do we really need the PCS as they are today? Is it even possible to score all those points correctly in a matter of a few seconds, max. minutes? How do you score transitions, do you go back to every element and look how it was connected to the next one? Do you count those transitions? Is transitions an objective matter? Because on these boards several people said that Verner's program is void of transitions and there is only stroking - but Chan said, that Verner's program is actually on par with his, concerning choreography and transitions. So is it objective? Why do we have so many different opinions then?
What if the huge amount of transitions result in more mistakes, e.g. Kozuka who does a whole lot of jumps out of some interesting move and who seemed a bit overstrained by it at these Worlds? Do you lower the transitions score as a result?
Because theoretically transitions and choreography are identical throughout the season, if there aren't any changes in the program. But they are never the same. Kozuka's had a transitions score of 6.95 at Worlds, but 7.20 at the GPF. Choreography went down from 7.4 to 7.05. That is actually not possible, because the choreo was exactly the same.
I say: chuck it all and call it "Reputation and Emotional Impact Score". Among the men it can range between 0 and 100.