- Joined
- Dec 26, 2025
I am 57 years old and have skated on and off for decades. My last three pairs of skates were customs because Spiteri, Harlick, and Kligbeil all measured me as a AAAAA heel. My last pair of Klingbeils are 19 years old and have hurt since having had babies and they are breaking down.
I know there are new players and new materials and I have moved to Dallas, TX, so I went to be “professionally” fit. I brought my current skates and said that my greatest concern over purchasing stock boots was that my heels and ankles are very narrow. She fit me for an Edea Piano. I spent several weeks trying to get used to them but felt that I had zero support and felt like I was skating in a slipper. Come to find out, she had sold me a “C” width boot, because that is what she stocked. I have had them modified twice by Skates US and have had custom insoles placed. I cannot skate for more than 10 minutes without severe pain that lasts into the next day. My foot moves too much and the navicular bone slams into the hard chassis, even with a hockey stop. My foot moves upward and then pronates on landings and the upper slams into the fibular tendon. I can only jump for ten minutes and limp off of the ice.
I have requested the dealer to reimburse me for the boots since she sold me something different than what I had asked for. I didn’t know they were wide until I happened to look at the box two months later.
I am wondering if this is appropriate, or do I just have to eat $1100 for a poor fitting boot when I specifically stated that I had a narrow foot.
I am feeling so defeated. I am about to get divorced so purchases will be heavily scrutinized. I have no family or friends in this area and work full time and have three kids…my only outlet is the rare opportunity that I get to skate.
I just want to know if I am being unreasonable for requesting a refund and considering small claims court.
Please advise. Thanks to all of you.
I know there are new players and new materials and I have moved to Dallas, TX, so I went to be “professionally” fit. I brought my current skates and said that my greatest concern over purchasing stock boots was that my heels and ankles are very narrow. She fit me for an Edea Piano. I spent several weeks trying to get used to them but felt that I had zero support and felt like I was skating in a slipper. Come to find out, she had sold me a “C” width boot, because that is what she stocked. I have had them modified twice by Skates US and have had custom insoles placed. I cannot skate for more than 10 minutes without severe pain that lasts into the next day. My foot moves too much and the navicular bone slams into the hard chassis, even with a hockey stop. My foot moves upward and then pronates on landings and the upper slams into the fibular tendon. I can only jump for ten minutes and limp off of the ice.
I have requested the dealer to reimburse me for the boots since she sold me something different than what I had asked for. I didn’t know they were wide until I happened to look at the box two months later.
I am wondering if this is appropriate, or do I just have to eat $1100 for a poor fitting boot when I specifically stated that I had a narrow foot.
I am feeling so defeated. I am about to get divorced so purchases will be heavily scrutinized. I have no family or friends in this area and work full time and have three kids…my only outlet is the rare opportunity that I get to skate.
I just want to know if I am being unreasonable for requesting a refund and considering small claims court.
Please advise. Thanks to all of you.