- Joined
- Sep 1, 2020
^^ Check the 2022 Worlds pairs thread. Entries are already listed, and Peng/Jin are not competing. No Chinese nor Russian teams.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I took the freedom to quote your post to this thread.ISU basically killed the pairs discipline. Its already not a popular discipline, and there are few pairs in the world, and very few top level pairs. It takes ages to develop a top level pair (overall its longer than singles, for instance). Scores to medal at worlds are lowest in about 10 years. Will they even have enough pairs for GP next year?
Sounds logical. doesn't it?I think you don't need all GP events if Russia does not take part, which is very likely. I would skip GP Russia and GP China and everything will be fine.
Well, then we can say it was the last nail in the pairs coffin.I took the freedom to quote your post to this thread.
I must say I disagree with your statement. I believe ISU killed nothing because if a discipline depends on one country's contribution only then it is dead already as an international sport. But is it, really? This is certainly worth discussion.
Regarding GP events, there was and interesting thought posted in yet another thread:
Sounds logical. doesn't it?
I wouldn't say it was a nail in a coffin but there certainly are issues to be dealt with. And, if you take away Russian pairs, these issues become far more obvious.Well, then we can say it was the last nail in the pairs coffin.
Watched the channel one cup, and worlds, and basically if you are one of those people who just watch the final warm-up...
I wouldn't say it was a nail in a coffin but there certainly are issues to be dealt with. And, if you take away Russian pairs, these issues become far more obvious.
To name one, since professionals no more exist as a category, pairs have a tendency to have long careers. Which means that several generations of juniors can't move to seniors and this creates a generation gap. For Russia, it is easier to deal with it because of the state-backed system that ensures the depth of the field, but elsewhere.... even China has problems, as it appears.
I'd say each longevity case is specific and different from pair to pair, from country to country. It can be beneficial and ensure extra senior spots internationally or it can be negative and get in the way and lead to other pairs' premature career end. We need wise federations to deal with that.But that longevity can cut both ways, can't it?.
Ryuichi has said that he intends to skate until 37, so Riku can go to another Olympics. I love the longevity of the pairs that do stick together. But it won't stand in the way of other pairs.
Also of course fierce "Older" competitors like Deanna Stellato and Zoe Jones.
But I am odd in that I have never watched skating, any discipline, only for top scorers. Personally, I find that limiting and boring. But I realize others don't, to each their own.
Ashley Cain-Gribble posted a video update on Facebook and on her Instagram account. She's very broken up. My heart goes out to her. There are links to the video in Ashley/Timothy fanfest, and in U.S. pairs thread. It may be that Ashley & Timothy had intended this to be their final season. Ashley's concussion sadly might seal their decision. My heart goes out to Ashley. I'm glad she has a lot of support around her, to help her get through this emotional transition. I wish that both Alexa/Brandon and Ashley/Timothy would come back for at least one more year, but we won't know until they let us know.
As well, there has been discussion of the Lu/Mitrofanov split in various threads. Misha has already paired with a new partner from the same Boston rink. TSL has prematurely leaked that Danny O'Shea recently tried out with Olivia Serafini (who had split with Mervin Tran last year, due to his retirement -- he was experiencing back problems).
If neither K/F nor C-G/LD decide to return competitively, then Calalang/Johnson, Chan/Howe, and others will take-up the baton.
Maybe the Senior grand prix can do something along the lines of the Junior grand prix - they have a reduced number of pairs events (4) so that the number of competitors is decent and the highest ranked pairs still reach the final in DecemberI would miss pairs so much. I hope ISU doesn’t cancel it. I had some hope with more countries developing the full 4 discipline teams, but if they would take an easy way out and we’ll never again see throws and lifts and death spirals… aww. Sad.
Sorry, but did I miss some crucial nifo? They want to cancel PAIRS?I would miss pairs so much. I hope ISU doesn’t cancel it. I had some hope with more countries developing the full 4 discipline teams, but if they would take an easy way out and we’ll never again see throws and lifts and death spirals… aww. Sad.
It's just the conversation drifting around. There is not enough pairs for next season to have full-scale GP events.Sorry, but did I miss some crucial nifo? They want to cancel PAIRS?
It’s interesting how the only discipline that seems to be really impacted by the absence of the Russians is pairs, isn’t it? I was thinking this while watching this Worlds—a wonderful competition all around, fabulous performances, didn’t miss the Russians at all—except in Pairs!It's just the conversation drifting around. There is not enough pairs for next season to have full-scale GP events.
Ah, not even if junior Pairs would come up? Btw. does anyone know if Peng/Jin will continue?It's just the conversation drifting around. There is not enough pairs for next season to have full-scale GP events.
My impressions were very different, and I missed my favorite skaters a huge deal, but I agree that pairs was the most impacted. On Junior level, it would be even more pronounced.It’s interesting how the only discipline that seems to be really impacted by the absence of the Russians is pairs, isn’t it? I was thinking this while watching this Worlds—a wonderful competition all around, fabulous performances, didn’t miss the Russians at all—except in Pairs!
I was going to write the same. too. I borrow our local commentator (The Swedish talking one) Marianne Nyman: "Worlds was worth of World championships in all other disciplines, expect the pairs, where about the medalists only the winning pair was at championship level. The others made too many errors." It would have been better at least if the Chinese were there.My impressions were very different, and I missed my favorite skaters a huge deal, but I agree that pairs was the most impacted. On Junior level, it would be even more pronounced.
I think it’s because of the way they’ve been shafted this year. Not even a 4CC bid. At their level one’s season doesn’t typically end with US Nationals.I'm surprised by comments like "I hope Calalang/Johnson stick around another year." They are only 27/26 years old and are just hitting their stride, and I haven't heard them say anything about retirement...? They'll only be 31/30 at the next Olympics. That's still younger than past Olympic champions. Moreover, next season the US pairs have 3 spots for Worlds and we don't even know if the current top 2 American pairs will compete, plus Lu/Mitrofanov just split, so the field is wide open! This would be a very exciting time to be an American pairs skater because of all the opportunities. I would be crushed if C/J retired! They have world-class lifts and a world-class overall look and just need to get those SBS consistent. Maybe they could enlist the help of Rafael Artunian like Alexa did for her jumps.
For next season I'm really excited to see how Chan/Howe have progressed in the off-season. I have high hopes for them too.