- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
The analogy with NBA and NFL rules is an interesting one. The original justification for eligibility rules in these sports were couched in terms of education. The powers-that-were did not want professional football and basketball players to be regarded as a bunch iof ignorant yahoos, like baseball and hockey players were. In baseball and hockey you could go right from high school (or even drop out) and take up an athletic career. The rule in basketball was that you had to attend and graduate from college first, so that you would be ofsome value to society instead of just some dumb jpock. Then the rule was weakend to, "you don't have to graduate from college, but you can't turn pro until after the graduation date of your college class." (Wilt Chamberlain dropped out of the Unibersity of Kansas in his junior year, but had to wait a year before he could sign up with an NBA team. He spent that waiting year with the Harlem Globetrotters.)I'm looking at you, NFL and NBA.
Then they changed the rules to allow "hardship cases" -- kids whose families were so poor that they were not destined to amount to anything anyway -- to play professionally right out of high school. LeBron James and Kobe Bryant werte notable examples (although in Bryant's case he was far from poor.)
In football, we saw the opposite trend. College football became such a money-maker for universities that the rules were constantly being contorted to allow "student-athletes" to stay in college for an extra year or so before they are pushed out into the pros.
Anyway, the sports world in general -- including figure skating -- is not overly exercised about the risks of physical, emotional and social development problems when children are pushed into the (scary) world of adults. Cewrtainly eduaction has fallen from the mix, what with "sports schools," home schooling, and the like.
Last edited: