Labeling people who are willing to stand up for what they think as some sort of delusional uberfan (which is the way I took what you are saying, forgive me if that wasn't your intent) is wrong.
Outing yourself as a Johnny Fan kind of kills any attempt of being / appearing objective or sensible whenever it's about Johnny or men's skating. You can try and try and try - your post will always be interpretated as emotional / delusional / illogical / fangirly. Your opinion isn't your opinion, it's just fangirly praising. Any kind of analysis is just a delusional fantasy. Johnny Fans cannot think, we only have vague emotions and uncontrolled unfounded illogical outbursts.
Did I mention that I voted for Johnny?
And imagine that (not that you will believe me) - I
considered other skaters. I thought about Adam Rippon, Rachel Flatt and Mirai Nagasu.
But what are the criteria for this kind of award? Number of clean skates? Number of Gold medals? Number of medals? Technical achievements? Artistry? Individualism? Creativity? Personality? Development over the years? "Wow-factor" in her / his personal history? Fairy-tale-factor? Work ethic?
Most of these factors are so subjective - of course we can add all the points together the skater got during the season, we can calculate the average score for the short program and the long program, we can count the number of falls, underrotations and step-outs. We can also take a look at the step sequences and spin levels - who maxed out the system the most?
Most of us don't have reasons like average numbers and scores - the reasons are mostly subjective. We go for style ("Zhang is so lyrical"), or fairy tale ("Nobody expected Rachael to win - but she did!"), or personality ("Mirai is so refreshing and cute"). I mean that's why it's the Reader's Choice award - because the objective (more or less

) judging and awarding is done by the judges.