Hi, long time lurker at GS, first time poster.
With these Olympics finally upon us, I've sort of regarded it as an end of an era with so many of the top skaters of the last two quads retiring after Sochi to make way for the new wave of skaters. It's got me thinking about the legacy and impact each of them will have left on the sport and which of them will be remembered over their rivals and why. A lot of that legacy is riding on how they perform in Sochi so this discussion might be about a week premature, but I thought it would be interesting anyway.
1. Yuna Kim vs. Mao Asada
If Mao never wins a gold medal, will she forever be in Yuna's shadow in the eyes of the history books or will history regard her as they do Michelle Kwan? How will history regard Yuna if she fails to defend her gold medal...and especially if she loses to an upstart like Lipnitskaia? She will forever be remembered as an Olympic gold medalist, but does her legacy suffer from her relative absence from the sport in the last quad and the failure to defend Olympic gold?
2. Virtue/Moir vs. Davis/White
If Davis/White win a gold medal in Sochi, both teams will have the same number of Olympic medals and world titles under their belt. Depending on whether they decide compete at Worlds, D/W will likely end up having more. Does the conventional wisdom that D/W have now surpassed V/M elevate them above their rivals once and for all? Or does the 'Bolero' status V/M's Mahler achieved in 2010 enough to cement their place in history? Or perhaps both teams will forever be linked with each other and no future story about one will fail to mention the other.
3. Patrick Chan
If he fails to win a gold medal in Sochi, will he still be regarded as one of the greats of the sport? Three world championships is nothing to sneeze at and his artistry remains virtually unparalleled. Does he really need Olympic hardware in his trophy cabinet to solidify his place in the sport? Or perhaps his legacy will be inflation and as a skater who the judges liked a whole lot more than the audience ever did.
Just some things I'd like to hear other people's thoughts on. I've always wondered why some skaters are remembered over others, despite being more decorated or having won more medals. Is it savvy media marketing or charisma or perhaps purely because they're American and Americans tend to elevate their own.
With these Olympics finally upon us, I've sort of regarded it as an end of an era with so many of the top skaters of the last two quads retiring after Sochi to make way for the new wave of skaters. It's got me thinking about the legacy and impact each of them will have left on the sport and which of them will be remembered over their rivals and why. A lot of that legacy is riding on how they perform in Sochi so this discussion might be about a week premature, but I thought it would be interesting anyway.
1. Yuna Kim vs. Mao Asada
If Mao never wins a gold medal, will she forever be in Yuna's shadow in the eyes of the history books or will history regard her as they do Michelle Kwan? How will history regard Yuna if she fails to defend her gold medal...and especially if she loses to an upstart like Lipnitskaia? She will forever be remembered as an Olympic gold medalist, but does her legacy suffer from her relative absence from the sport in the last quad and the failure to defend Olympic gold?
2. Virtue/Moir vs. Davis/White
If Davis/White win a gold medal in Sochi, both teams will have the same number of Olympic medals and world titles under their belt. Depending on whether they decide compete at Worlds, D/W will likely end up having more. Does the conventional wisdom that D/W have now surpassed V/M elevate them above their rivals once and for all? Or does the 'Bolero' status V/M's Mahler achieved in 2010 enough to cement their place in history? Or perhaps both teams will forever be linked with each other and no future story about one will fail to mention the other.
3. Patrick Chan
If he fails to win a gold medal in Sochi, will he still be regarded as one of the greats of the sport? Three world championships is nothing to sneeze at and his artistry remains virtually unparalleled. Does he really need Olympic hardware in his trophy cabinet to solidify his place in the sport? Or perhaps his legacy will be inflation and as a skater who the judges liked a whole lot more than the audience ever did.
Just some things I'd like to hear other people's thoughts on. I've always wondered why some skaters are remembered over others, despite being more decorated or having won more medals. Is it savvy media marketing or charisma or perhaps purely because they're American and Americans tend to elevate their own.