-3 for flutzing? | Golden Skate

-3 for flutzing?

adamlondon

On the Ice
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
I know the topic of flutzing has been repeated over and over again. But I noticed Mao Asada got a -3 score from one of the judges at her own country for her flutz. Was a bit shocked at first but having thought about it it may not be too much.

If someone's lutz is clearly a flip the the jump is really a flip with a swinging edge before take off. The question arises is how much more difficult is a flip compared to a lutz? When I see the perfect lutzes from Yu Na Kim, say, I think it takes a lot more strength to do a lutz as the whole body and the feet are the wrong way from rotation making the whole jump different and harder. With a flip one can possible prerotate a little and get away with it but with a true lutz one cannot. Now I dont skate will someone who does tell me whether this is true?

The next question is how much a deduction in GOE should be administered? I would argue that any inside edge lutz should get a -3 deduction as a base, and if all other phases are excellent then that should be added accordingly. So Mao Asada's lutzes I think should get -1 or -2 given that everything else is so good. If we think about it, like Joesitz was saying about why jumps are different, it's really only the take off whivh makes the jump different and more difficult. If a triple lutz is 50% more valuable than a lutz (4 vs 6 marks) then actually we can see how one has to do three triple toes to get the marks for two lutzes. Big difference!

Now the other interesting question comes from people who lip. They are essentially making the jump harder and getting penalised for that. Is that justified? I guess if I were a judge I would be less harsh on those who do it like Shizuka and Sarah Meier. But equally I would argue that actually the people who lip have not got the skills to do a DIFFERENT type of jump. The technique is obviously different to a lutz so their jumping skills are less than those who can do both correctly.

Among the top competitors for the ladies its Yu Na who can do both and looks like Miki is catching up (maybe proof it's easier to fix a lip than a flutz). Therefore in the case of lips I would take -1 from the baseline value.

The Russian federation I see have given 2 extra points for girls who do both lutzes and flips off the right edges. This is a good point for the younger girls who are learning to skate where they will learn that a flutz simply will not do when they compete.
 

gsrossano

Final Flight
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
I would rather eat a toad than get into another discussion about flutzing, so a slightly different question/comment here.

Are you sure the -3 was just for the edge change? Unfortunately the protocols don't tell you why the judge gave the mark they did, or whether the judge thought there was more than one error. Anybody see it on TV/YouTube? It could be the judge thought the jump had another problem in addition to the edge change. Or maybe they decided the edge change was so horrendous they decided to take off the max on it.
 

Tinymavy15

Sinnerman for the win
Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
maybe the jump was landed poorly etc... how do you know that the -3 was just for the flutz. if so, that is taking the flutz issue WAY to far. -1 yes, not -3!
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
It's a rarety that Russian skaters would flutz to begin with. They are Technicians without Peers. I'm also glad to see the Japanese taking an interest in technique and bringing them into the scoring. Hopefully we can see the end of attempting a jump soon.

Joe
 

adamlondon

On the Ice
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
It's a rarety that Russian skaters would flutz to begin with. They are Technicians without Peers. I'm also glad to see the Japanese taking an interest in technique and bringing them into the scoring. Hopefully we can see the end of attempting a jump soon.

Joe

That's true I think the Russians are real technicians in one sense. Shame the ladies have never won the Olumpics. Thinking about it the last three Oly champs have had this flutz lip problems, the two Americans being the worst.
 

Mehdi

On the Ice
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
I don't remember seeing a Russian skater flutz indeed.
I do remember seeing many of them do flips from the outside edge though ... (Sokolova, Volchkova, Soldatova, Plushenko ...)
 
Last edited:

vlaurend

Final Flight
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Judges would be very unlikely to give -3 GOE on a lutz just for flutzing. There was certainly something else wrong with the jump, such as a 2-footed landing, underrotated landing, step-out, stumble, or even two of these problems. Mao usually gets -1 GOE on her lutz because she flutzes, but the rest of the jump is good and she does the jump out of a difficult entry (brackets).
 

fenway

On the Ice
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Yah a -3 sounds incredibly harsh for a flutz. Even I think that and they're one of my biggest pet peeves in skating! There must've been another reason.
 

adamlondon

On the Ice
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Judges would be very unlikely to give -3 GOE on a lutz just for flutzing. There was certainly something else wrong with the jump, such as a 2-footed landing, underrotated landing, step-out, stumble, or even two of these problems. Mao usually gets -1 GOE on her lutz because she flutzes, but the rest of the jump is good and she does the jump out of a difficult entry (brackets).

I wonder whether the judges have to compulsorily put skaters in the negative GOEs when they are told by the technical panel that the edge is wrong. I mean, if a lutz is so huge and has difficulty in entrance and landing can it be, say, +1 or even 0?
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
I wonder whether the judges have to compulsorily put skaters in the negative GOEs when they are told by the technical panel that the edge is wrong. I mean, if a lutz is so huge and has difficulty in entrance and landing can it be, say, +1 or even 0?
According to the rules, if the technical specialist calls wrong edge the judges must give a negative GOE regardless of other factors (page 8)

http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-183415-200633-121139-0-file,00.pdf

Once in a while they don't, though. I think this is just an error on the part of the judge.
 

just wondering

On the Ice
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
According to the rules, if the technical specialist calls wrong edge the judges must give a negative GOE regardless of other factors (page 8)

http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-183415-200633-121139-0-file,00.pdf

Once in a while they don't, though. I think this is just an error on the part of the judge.


I've often wondered why things like that aren't programmed into the calculations, e.g. if a judge attempts to give a +x or 0 on a flutz, an override kicks the number to -1 GOE.
I know it's not as precise as an exact -GOE, but at least it reduces the impact of an avoidable and obvious judging error.

JW
 

chuckm

Record Breaker
Joined
Aug 31, 2003
Country
United-States
The caller specifies a wrong edge was used, and the judges take negative GOE.

The problem is that some judges give -3 GOE for a flutz/lip, and some give -1 or even 0. Judges who for some reason WANT to lower the scores for certain skaters take advantage of the edge call to pile on negative GOE whenever they can.

Mao Asada has one of the worst flutzes since Sasha left the eligible scene. It is plain to the naked eye. But sometimes Mao gets -1 for her flutz, while Kimmie Meissner's hardly noticeable lip gets -1.5 most of the time.
 

just wondering

On the Ice
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
I'm probably not explaining myself very well :). I'm imaging that, if programmed correctly, a judge could pile on the negative GOE to their heart's content, but if a judge incorrectly or inadvertently awarded a 0 or + GOE, even though a wrong edge call was made by the tech spec, the computer program would automatically override the non-negative GOE and default to a -1 GOE for that jump.

This could have the effect of slightly, but automatically and consistently, minimizing a judge's scoring error.

Does this make sense?
JW
 

indicatoto101

On the Ice
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Mao Asada has one of the worst flutzes since Sasha left the eligible scene. It is plain to the naked eye. But sometimes Mao gets -1 for her flutz, while Kimmie Meissner's hardly noticeable lip gets -1.5 most of the time.

The judges also factor in other parts of the jump such as the transitions, air position, and landing. Mao's flutz is typically superior to Kimmie's lip in these aspects so this is why she gets less -GOE although her change of edge is worse.
 

decker

On the Ice
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
According to the rules, if the technical specialist calls wrong edge the judges must give a negative GOE regardless of other factors (page 8)

http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-183415-200633-121139-0-file,00.pdf

Once in a while they don't, though. I think this is just an error on the part of the judge.

I wonder if there is honest confusion. The text of the rule (page 1) states only that the judges "must reduce their score accordingly." But the table on page 8 specifies - GOE. Personally, I would flip to the table. I find tables easier to interpret unless they are very poorly designed. But some people are scared of tables, especially tables with numbers.

I actually looked at all the GP protocols one day when I was reeeeaally bored (and school wasn't back in session yet). I didn't set up a spreadsheet or anything LOL, but I seem to recall that in the vast majority of cases, there was only 1 judge on a panel who seemed less strict. Sometimes it was also only 1 skater. Ahem.

Anyway, I don't believe I found any wrong-edge jumps that got base or + in the final score (post-trimming, etc.). There might have been 1?

Susan
 
Top