- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
If you do have a relevant study please do post a link!maybe you should read the entire study.... and there are others... i rest my case. I disagree with your statement wholeheartedly. You are free to believe whatever you want
If you do have a relevant study please do post a link!maybe you should read the entire study.... and there are others... i rest my case. I disagree with your statement wholeheartedly. You are free to believe whatever you want
i already did no need for me to engage any further.If you do have a relevant study please do post a link!
no, it was a clinical study that I could see, where the data was not broken down in to age groups, and where the age group tested was up to 40. It would need to have a non-clinical element, have particpants in all age groups, and for the data to be broken down in to age groups. You may well find that you are correct with regard to the clinical setting even for older age groups, but likely to find that outside of a clinical setting those results would not exist, because of psycholgical and other additional factors which did not exist in the clinical setting, where the "ability to be receptive to new music" has been defined in a very limited way.i already did no need for me to engage any further.
look, you asked me to prove my point.... my point is not related to age but to exposure and experience. That study shows that. I am a musician and i don't work in a clinical setting or in 'a study" . I experience it every day for myself and with my colleagues, and with the students I teach. I can make anyone love anything by exposing them to the music. I also believe that people in this field or a related field like choreographers are avid learners of all kinds of music. Carol Lane and others may still have their preference but I disagree with your statement that she only does one thing and that thing is related to her age and music she heard when she was a teenager. I have no problem at all if you disagree with me.no, it was a clinical study that I could see, where the data was not broken down in to age groups, and where the age group tested was up to 40. It would need to have a non-clinical element, have particpants in all age groups, and for the data to be broken down in to age groups. You may well find that you are correct with regard to the clinical setting even for older age groups, but likely to find that outside of a clinical setting those results would not exist, because of psycholgical and other additional factors which did not exist in the clinical setting, where the "ability to be receptive to new music" has been defined in a very limited way.
well, in terms of the music of this thread, you certainly failed to make me love it in terms of point and counterpoint, in which it was severely egregious. all the best!look, you asked me to prove my point.... my point is not related to age but to exposure and experience. That study shows that. I am a musician and i don't work in a clinical setting or in 'a study" . I experience it every day for myself and with my colleagues, and with the students I teach. I can make anyone love anything by exposing them to the music. I also believe that people in this field or a related field like choreographers are avid learners of all kinds of music. Carol Lane and others may still have their preference but I disagree with your statement that she only does one thing and that thing is related to her age and music she heard when she was a teenager. I have no problem at all if you disagree with me.
the point is that the results were got in a clinical setting and therefore not necessarily repeateable or those which would be got in real life, because the environment was artificial. You can play someone twenty new pieces of music in a lab, and those people may say they like them, but that doesn't mean in the real world they would have listened to those twenty pieces of music. it's a clinical result.And when someone does put in some work and actually providing one, the study is being debunked as being too clinical.
precisely, you are an anecdote. I actually experience this bias as an older person. In my twenties I could break down the charts, read every music magazine, was always seeking new sounds, and music more often than not took on a much more personal meeaning in a way new music i listen to never does. I am of course also an anecdote. But I think I am more the norm.......No study, just me. It's anecdotal.
the discussion is of Piper and Paul's music choices. I've said what I see is the general cutting off point for music from that camp, and I was in no way surprised by either of the music choices- they seemed wholly predictable. I could easily point out biases, nostalgic choreographing from other coaches as well, but that's not this thread.Why the generalisation and why the focus on one coach?
a point cannot be discriminatory. it's just a point. the choices from the camp are often extremely old fashioned, and very little of it is recent (i.e. in the last two decades) music, in terms of culture or origination. I want to think why?a point that is simply discriminatory
The Tempo of the music throughout the Pattern Dance Element must be constant and in accordance
with the required Tempo and character of the chosen Rhythm.
• Pattern Dance Element: Midnight Blues, range 86-96 beats per minute
P(attern) S(tep)T skated to the same Rhythm and character chosen for the Midnight Blues, a dance accepted about 1999. The chosen
tune may be the same as for Midnight Blues or different but must have the same tempo. The
Tempo of the music throughout Midnight Blues and PSt must be constant and in accordance
with the required range of Tempo.
The other rhythm(s) maybe picked from Street Dance Rhythms: (such as hip hop, disco, swing, krump, popping, funk, etc.), jazz, reggaeton
You must not recall their 2015-2016 FD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woKl_yx1P_0The music is late sixties/seventies in origin (yes, I know the Elton John songs are just in the eighties, but he's really a seventies artist), so it's par for the course for Carol Lane as an older person whose abilty to become receptive to new music has diminished (which is what happens to the vast majority of people).
I don't think they deserve to be on the Olympic podium, but of course it all comes down to the individual competition and skate.
If you're interested, Govardo (who did P2's Vincent programme, and they're using for this year's FD) have today just posted their cover of the "Long and Winding Road" on youtube - with a picture of Piper & Paul as the cover photo. I am assuming this is the cover they will be using, and I have to say I think it has incredible potential - it's very different to the original Beatles track, there's definitely build to it!!Long and Winding Road is far from my favourite of the Beatles repertoire, so I'm not ecstatic to hear this is their choice for the Olympic season. It's so morose, at least in its original form. There's no build in the music. I hope they can work their magic with it, and have come up with a great rendition. I hope it won't be another Perry Mason situation. Their RD is great.
Thanks for sharing thisIf you're interested, Govardo (who did P2's Vincent programme, and they're using for this year's FD) have today just posted their cover of the "Long and Winding Road" on youtube - with a picture of Piper & Paul as the cover photo. I am assuming this is the cover they will be using, and I have to say I think it has incredible potential - it's very different to the original Beatles track, there's definitely build to it!!
Agreed, I felt the same about a number of the programs at Lombardia too.Idk, I need to see them both with better camera work before I make my final judgement
Subjectivity and all that, for sure. However, it seems that you haven't been with Piper & Paul on their journey from the very beginning. So, you don't appear to get all of the nuances, the beautiful connection, the intention, the emotion, and the spirit of their partnership dance through the years. Your loss, if that's the case. This program is the touching culmination of everything they have given to us and to each other. It's not grand, self-important or overly self-reflective, but it is lovely and creative. It certainly references their recent FDs, in a good, emotional and relevant way. It's not a 'rehash,' as you say you 'feared.' But then maybe you missed what the other programs are about as well.All in all, for me, it's a solid FD but not one which particularly excites me.