I think we can agree that past results should not be taken into account in determining the results of the present competition.
Choosing teams for the next future competition can only be done by relying on past results.* The question is, should they rely only on the results of the national championship just concluded half an hour in the past? Or should they also look further back to other competitions that took place weeks or months previously?
*ETA: OK, that's not the only way teams could be chosen. They could ignore past results and be chosen by lottery or auction with spots on the team going to the highest bidder, etc. But I don't think anyone would prefer that approach.
Choosing teams for the next future competition can only be done by relying on past results.* The question is, should they rely only on the results of the national championship just concluded half an hour in the past? Or should they also look further back to other competitions that took place weeks or months previously?
*ETA: OK, that's not the only way teams could be chosen. They could ignore past results and be chosen by lottery or auction with spots on the team going to the highest bidder, etc. But I don't think anyone would prefer that approach.
Last edited: