^ It goes both ways. You could also say, "Wow, does her management company need more money? I need to find a superstar to manage!"
You might feel differently if you felt that your agency had stolen 800 million won from you. I don't think you would just say, oh well, easy come easy go.
It was a settlement, I don't see any part saying that's what she was owed, though. It's such a short blurb that I don't think either side of the story is really represented. considering her yearly worth is close to 10 million US dollars.... 640k is chump change. Like me going to court for someone who shorted me a 20.
so more money for Kim,
wasn't this the agency that gave kim a lot of emotion stress and pressured kim a lot ?
It was a settlement, I don't see any part saying that's what she was owed, though. It's such a short blurb that I don't think either side of the story is really represented. considering her yearly worth is close to 10 million US dollars.... 640k is chump change. Like me going to court for someone who shorted me a 20.
Who r the young skaters signed with ATS? Is the mother their agent?
It seems the concept of justice is lost on some people.
I'm glad for YuNa. Even if she doesn't "need" the money she received from the settlement, it appears the parties involved agreed that she should get it. And for all the jealous moaning about how much YuNa has made in her best couple of years, IB Sports is a company that makes over $37 million per year (2010).
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/financials.asp?ticker=011420:KS
You mean $3.7 million.
Correct.No. According to the businessweek link, in 2010 IB Sports (the company that had to pay Yuna for income withheld) had Gross Revenues of $37 million and a Gross Profit of $3.3 million.