Doggygirl said:Well, if it was a contest for who could complete a couple of 3X3's, Kimmie would have won. Unfortunately for Kimmie, it was a contest including 2 different programs with jumps + other stuff. (I'm jazzing you here..)
Kimmie missed her combo in the SP, and had a fall in the LP on a singled Axel. Those two things alone cost her a lot of points. Her levels and execution of spins and spirals and FW IMO are nowhere near Sasha (yet). If you take a look at the score sheets the point spread is easily justified IMO.
DG
I thought so. But my question was more of an open-ended one. It originated from this comment:
And you can bet that if Michelle throws out there two perfect programs while Irina does 1 or 2 mistakes, you can ber your bootie that the USFSA will file a complaint and maybe even win it.
and I responded with, depends on what level MK skates at. If MK is not at Irina's level (which I wouldn't think so at this point), there's not much she can do to catch up. So I ask, where's the real justification for this? I tried to use the analogy of Kimmie vs. Cohen- Kimmie doing more difficult jumps but not having the overall package to compete with a skater like Cohen. The real "point behind the question" was, could one make an argument that Kimmie should have won instead of Sasha? Judging by what you said, I suppose not.