- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
1. Yeah, no idea if it is still bothering him or not, but at least up until post-GPF it is still bothering him.
2. I actually agree with him 100%. I know some people said 3A is overrated, especially when you can exchange it with quads nowadays. It only matters in juniors because you can't quad in SP. However, it is literally a jump you cannot escape because it is a required jump in both SP and LP. You can't afford to botch this
3. There is that, but at the same time I think he probably is looking at his competitors (and how judges marked them) too. They are delivering 4-5 quads now and (kind of) actually landing them. Also, he seems to be the type who don't want to depend on other people's mistake for him to win. I guess he is considering the advantages and disadvantages of it. He probably initially thought that 4 would be enough for oly, as long as he is clean and delivering it with good quality. But at 4CC I can sense he began to question that.
3. Agreed. I mean one very good thing about him is he's a good balance of his own thoughtful ideals but also the realities of the field. When 4-5 quads bring a bump in PCS, he has to be fairly realistic. I do see how in 4CC he's reevaluating in his answers. Whatever he does, it's the maximum of what he believes he can accomplish, so an interesting thing for me to observe is if he'll adjust the complexity of his programs in order to accommodate more quads. If that happens though, I'll have to say I look forward to at least a moderate swing away from the quad chase post-Olympics.
Last edited:










