Yeah and with such high scores like w/p's and american's
But if P/C get the same levels as W/P and H/D, they beat them both by two points because (as it stands at present) P/C's PCS is generally two points above theirs. Their PCS is also as a standard about the same as V/M. Maybe with an American and Canadian tech controller there was a a pro-north American attitude on the the tech panel which is why all three got personal bests; and maybe it's about sending their teams out in to the season with a really high starter score as precedent; but that's all supposition; and based on what I saw of V/M, the edge quality on their non-touching (which would be choreographed for a level 4) was excellent. Plus if you look at the practices that they put out for both the short and free, they ignore virtually everything apart from the step sequences- that's what they are concentrating on- and the reason they are doing it is because a, they know it is important in terms of how scores are currently worked out, and b, it is a strength of theirs.
P/C will have and will have to do and I am sure are doing the same. It's very easy to look at the emotional and artistic side of their performances of both the short and free and Finlandia and think that's what they are all about; but there is certainly work going on behind the scenes in terms of the levels. I think you have to look at the level 4 for the diagonal step sequence they got Worlds 2017 in the free. The elements of the sequence had been changed and switched around and they nailed it in what was both an artistically gratifying and technically superlative step sequence. Both V/M and P/C are potentially going to max out their short or long on levels (as are some other teams). At which point GOE and PCS will come in to play (and if they both max out on the same programmes in the same competition, they will be all that comes in to play). It will be an odd situation to have two teams who on paper have done exactly the same thing, and the only difference in mark will be based on who is judged to have done it better, but that is likely this season. If one of the teams misses a level and then doesn't win, I think that, in terms of the judging system, we also get an explanation as to why the sport is losing the casual non-skating viewer, who doesn't care for something where the winner or loser can be decided upon the fact a skater did a three turn instead of a counter during the a step sequence; and can't even tell that it was the case (and if i'm honest, I'm a bit of that ilk).
And if a number of top teams including P/C do max out their levels, who wins? Well, in my opinion, it can't be called. It may well be V/M in the short, and P/C in the free, with enough to give P/C a victory. But against the other teams it is certainly at present V/M or P/C for the win. But there is a whole season to come. The best P/C can do (and what I am sure they doing) is seeking to max their levels out at every skate. If they achieve that, that in itself will be a fright to every other skating couple. Because as much as any other skating couple might end up being able to the same things; can it really be said that any other couple do it better? It has to be an attacking season for them.
That said, I don't want a Virtue and Moir versus Davies and White situation. i don't think that what that did for skating was good in the slightest; in terms of artistry and feel of programmes. I want P/C to get the levels and go for them but I don't want the abstract from the competition side of what they do to be lost as they get engaged in a series of one upmanship manoeuvres, where connection between them is sacrificed for show-off moves, andreally eggy facial expression to convince the judges they are getting drama at every second; and the sacrifice of soulfulness to prove they are the best. They need to get the levels within overall packages that are business as usual. When the competition gets really tight, it will those who are functioning in an uber competitive, really over egging of the programmes manner who end up making mistakes......... or losing levels because of it.
And if they don't get the Olympic Gold, well, they should have four more years experience when the next one comes around. Four more years in which to delight us; for more years in which they will get to function as artists, meet and work with amazing and interesting people like Jeffery, Chris and their coaching team and exist in what I'm sure will be a lovely environment at Gadbois; four more years in which to travel all over the world in competition. Four more years of free Lacoste clothing. Four more years in which the youngest contenders for the Olympic gold here; and indeed the youngest couple in the top ten at Worlds last year, and maybe this year too to get their technical skills to the highest point-scoring levels for the next time around.