- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
Doing a quad consistently doesn't mean anything by itself. Vincent has not delivered at ANY competition. He has "got it together" for 0 competitions this year. 1 is more than 0. Ross at Nationals is better than anything Vincent did all season and better than anything Vincent has EVER done as a Senior.
But Miner internationally has been supremely mediocre in comparison to Vincent. He did not have a single solid international in the past year, whereas Vincent has had Junior Worlds, a silver at Finlandia (landing 4 ratified quads in the FS) and 4th at COC.
The fact that Miner was 0.68 points higher than Zhou after skating his very best, and Zhou having 6 tech calls, makes it painfully obvious that Zhou is the smarter choice.
It was a great achievment placing 2nd at Nationals but this was a one-off result for Miner if we consider competitions from the past 2 seasons (which the US team selection criteria is defined by). Or even competitions from this season.
And even though Miner fully deserved the win, if I were placing money, I would 100% still bet on Zhou scoring higher overall.
Zhou's international scores this season: 222.21, 250.01, 256.66 (average: 242.63)
Miner's international scores this season: 219.62, 219.96, 233.72 (average: 224.43)
And somehow Miner at his best beating Zhou far-from-his-best by 0.68 at Nationals negates that?! Please.
The only thing that kept Miner in the Olympic conversation should have been if Nationals was a team trials - which it has been stated many times, is not. Even if the only criteria was just Nationals it'd be sending Miner based on purely fairness/his placement - and not because it's a *logical* decision based on how he has competed and been assessed internationally relative to others.
Just a horrible situation all around, sucks for everyone involved...



