- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
I'm confused. You say that the gold is clearly Nathan's to win because he could've scored 327-330 which would have easily won because Hanyu's only done that precisely one time?IDK. If you extrapolate based on previous performance, and included very mild Olympic inflation (I think it would've been more than I've allotted), a clean Chen (with 4Lz/4F instead as he should've been doing all along) at Olympics would've probably put up around 106-107 in the SP and then 215 in LP. That's 321-322 points. That would've easily won. And Hanyu's only done that 3 times. If instead his LP was clean - with the benefit of being in the late group - he probably would've put up around 221-223. That's 327-330. Hanyu had done that precisely once, and hadn't come close since 2015. I'm also being somewhat conservative on the likely PCS and GOE inflation.
So, yeah, Hanyu would've had a lot of trouble if Nathan would've been clean (we can debate if these scores are fair, but it is what it is). And probably would've lost no matter what he did since Olympic judges like to award technical skates generically.
Except Nathan has done that precisely zero times? Even if you tried to cherry pick his SP and FS from different competitions? How does that prove anything? And why is Nathan the only one who would benefit from "mild Olympic inflation"?