In an interview from last year she shared pretty much the same thoughts about 2006 also.
She has always been very competitive, always go for gold, so i can understand her position on how the Olympics went.
I do believe there is also some truth to it, Figure Skating being so US centric at the time because of the sponsors, so there was more push for the americans to get the medals, and other skaters were completely ignored even in spite of often clean stronger performances. (for me Fumie Suguri was even more robbed than Irina).
That said looking back, Irina's free skate both in 2002 and 2006 didn't age all that well, there were mistakes.
2010 is still hard to digest for me personally, having rewatched the event multiple times all these years.
It's hard to understand where exactly Lysacek won.
You watch his free skate and Johnny Weir's FS side by side and i really don't understand where that 20 points gap comes from.
Packaging and quality of skating Weir, Takahashi, Lambiel, Chan all skate better than Lysacek: deeper edges, better posture, more skating on one foot. While technically Lysacek programs were not the most difficult.
Yes Lysacek had difficult entries but they weren't matched with the music at all, the positions weren't great and not held: take his catchfoot or his back spiral for example.
What's even more surprising is that came from Frank Carroll who kept saying for many years how figure skating shouldn't be about counting beans and that's what i feel watching Evan's performance, a lot of things done just to get the points, and for a Nichol program that was very conservative and not particularly original especially compared to the others.