It shouldn't. Frankly, it feels like judges still do holistic judging with the IJS, when it isn't designed to be used that way. Anna for instance deserves high PCS in interpretation, but her SS is certainly not in the same range as her musicality. Yet, judges don't make that distinction. There just isn't enough differentiation between different elements and different PCS categories or GOE on different elements Why can't a judge give Anna a 9.5 in interpretation and a 7.5 in SS. Give her high GOE on her choreographic sequence, and +0/1 on her 4Lz. ( Yes, there are positives... her rotation position is lovely but also a few minutes including the edge)
Certainly, this doesn't just apply to Anna . It is something we see for most of the favorites. Last year, Alena ( who deserves high GOE on most jumps) wouldn't get penalized for her sometimes flat 3Lz edge and would get really high GOE on her rather ugly I-spin. She also got equally high marks in SS and interpretation. Even though she is the opposite of Anna and deserves 9.5 in SS and 8 in interpretation. I think the judges have a hard time judging in the IJS system. I wish they would be encouraged to use a wider variety of marks for more accurate judging.
I would like to see a change from PCS to a breakout for something like a foundations of skating with transitions and skating skills getting a score and then an artistic score which would be performance, composition and interpretation of music. But would that be too complicated? There are some lovely performers who don't have phenomenal skating skills and vice versa there are skaters with lovely skating skills but don't really interpret their music/perform a program.
. (Maybe Boyang Jin or Mikhail Kolyda.)
) as Lutz-Toe, but it's completely understandable.