- Joined
- Mar 20, 2019
Rather than their heights I think it's Kamila's distance on the 3A which is absurdly long that makes the height of her jump look smaller. Kamila's 3A height is 10% more than Liza, but if Liza is 5' tall and Kamila 5'3 or max 5'5, the difference in their height is 5-8%. So relative to their heights Kamila's 3A is higher too, but even I will agree from looking that Liza's "looks" higher. My initial instinct is Kamila gets distance but not height too. Although, looking at the numbers it feels almost cheating to not allow her the height bullet. I have no clue what the right and fair way to judge would be.I think when evaluating GOE jumps you have to base it on the visual. It’s cool to see Kamila jumps so high but because she looks so tall on ice 57 cm 3A does not have the same look as Liza 52 cm who looks shorter or Aliona 3A in 2019 who was also shorter. Only my opinion though but I could certainly see those who argue it should be about absolute height
As you said I feel like lots of the time judges do base it on visuals. And that shows that even if we get computer technical judging it's possible that jumps we think as humans aren't as high or far will get more GOE and everyone will be mad all over again!


Now my only problem is that SP is on Christmas eve..