US Olympic Team Announced | Page 42 | Golden Skate

US Olympic Team Announced

“Potential” scoring ability (Ilia having a higher scoring ceiling than Jason) or “number of quad jumps planned or completed” are also not part of the scoring criteria.
Well, it's not just "potential" as Ilya scored higher at Nationals than Jason ever has. It kind of trivializes Ilya's accomplishment when you make his potential ceiling sound like something theoretical instead of what he actually put out in an important competition.
 
Well, it's not just "potential" as Ilya scored higher at Nationals than Jason ever has. It kind of trivializes Ilya's accomplishment when you make his potential ceiling sound like something theoretical instead of what he actually put out in an important competition.
Exactly. Ilia REALIZED it. Only once, but Jason never came close. Will Ilia be able to repeat that and to go from there under different circumstances? One should have included a great surprise in the criteria. Jason will be fine in shows; but there's no point to let him go in order to place somewhere when there's a promising alternative around.
 
Exactly. Ilia REALIZED it. Only once, but Jason never came close. Will Ilia be able to repeat that and to go from there under different circumstances? One should have included a great surprise in the criteria. Jason will be fine in shows; but there's no point to let him go in order to place somewhere when there's a promising alternative around.


Jason is more than "fine in shows". Jason is a elite, competitive athlete whose median score is twenty points more than Ilia's, going into Nats.
Ilia has never come close to what he did at Nats, and of course there was Nats' home cooking. For everyone.

Jason has taken the scoring as the ISU currently constructs it and placed routinely on international podiums with scoring rom international judges, finishing ahead of many a quadster. Neither Jason nor Ilia have a chance of medaling in Beijing, even if that were a criteria, in a "normal" comp.

I have always been an advocate of "first three go". But I am also an advocate of fairness. The criteria are what they are, Jason played by the rules, and Jason qualified. There is every point in selecting the skater who qualified and "allowing" him to go. :biggrin:
 
Jason is more than "fine in shows". Jason is a elite, competitive athlete whose median score is twenty points more than Ilia's, going into Nats.
Ilia has never come close to what he did at Nats, and of course there was Nats' home cooking. For everyone.
The scores are "home cooked" but not the skaters' performances. If Ilya skated his Nationals performances at his Senior B and scored 40 points lower, his international senior mean score would be higher than Jason's. If Ilya then came in 5th at Nationals behind Jason in 3rd, would you have put Ilya on the team?
 
Exactly. Ilia REALIZED it. Only once, but Jason never came close. Will Ilia be able to repeat that and to go from there under different circumstances? One should have included a great surprise in the criteria. Jason will be fine in shows; but there's no point to let him go in order to place somewhere when there's a promising alternative around.

Oh for gods sake. As a senior, Jason has an international PB of 274.82, has won nationals and has medaled at 5 others. He’s won silver and bronze at 4CCs and placed in the top 10 at Worlds every time he ever competed there. In 2014 he was one of the youngest men to make the Olympic team and made the final flight for the FS. He’s won 6 challengers / senior Bs and medaled at 4 others. He’s medaled at 10 GPs and qualified for the GPF twice. He also won 2 JGPs and took silver at 3 others, won the JGP and medaled twice at junior worlds.

Remind me of how many of those things Ilia has done? Oh yeah. He has medaled once at senior Nats, won two JGPs, medaled at one Challenger, and placed 5th at Skate America. His highest senior international score to date is 245.35.

Notice any difference?

By the way, to the extent you’re still focused on Ilia’s nationals score, Jason has scored 290 twice. Without a fully rotated quad.
 
Yeah. One has been 17 for around two months, so he hasn't had any opportunities to not win a GP or 4CC aside from Skate America last year.

But Ilia's team made that choice not to go senior this year. I don't blame them, it was the smart choice at the time. But it also means a "wowza" moment at Nats won't qualify you for the Olympics.

In 2013-14, Jason had the choice to stay junior, where he would have slayed, or go senior. He went senior. I realize there are many different factors, but that choice can be made.
 
Jason is more than "fine in shows". Jason is a elite, competitive athlete whose median score is twenty points more than Ilia's, going into Nats.
Ilia has never come close to what he did at Nats, and of course there was Nats' home cooking. For everyone.

Jason has taken the scoring as the ISU currently constructs it and placed routinely on international podiums with scoring rom international judges, finishing ahead of many a quadster. Neither Jason nor Ilia have a chance of medaling in Beijing, even if that were a criteria, in a "normal" comp.

I have always been an advocate of "first three go". But I am also an advocate of fairness. The criteria are what they are, Jason played by the rules, and Jason qualified. There is every point in selecting the skater who qualified and "allowing" him to go. :biggrin:
I said "Jason WILL be fine in shows" - when he ends his career. He was successful as far as he could be - and this means: no medals at the Olys or worlds. Ilia PERHAPS can get there. PERHAPS. Jason for sure not. But having a skater with the potential to be top three when it counts should be imperative for a federation as big as the US.
 
But it also means a "wowza" moment at Nats won't qualify you for the Olympics.
Says who? If Ilya won Nationals by 100 points, he'd certainly be on the team. The actual situation is obviously very different, but it is false to say that any result at Nationals alone won't qualify you. You make these very sweeping statements when the truth is that everything is looked at on a case-by-case basis, as it should be.
 
I said "Jason WILL be fine in shows" - when he ends his career. He was successful as far as he could be - and this means: no medals at the Olys or worlds. Ilia PERHAPS can get there. PERHAPS. Jason for sure not. But having a skater with the potential to be top three when it counts should be imperative for a federation as big as the US.

Ilia *for sure* would not have medaled at this year's Olympics. Just no. If Nathan, Yuzu, Shoma, Yuma, Vincent and many others tanked, perhaps. But if all those skaters tanked, Jason, with his solid international scores, is just as likely to medal.

Will Ilia medal at in 2026. Let's watch and see:hap10:
 
Says who? If Ilya won Nationals by 100 points, he'd certainly be on the team. The actual situation is obviously very different, but it is false to say that any result at Nationals alone won't qualify you. You make these very sweeping statements when the truth is that everything is looked at on a case-by-case basis, as it should be.

My apologies, I should have specified a "wowza" moment such as he had, not the scenario you describe.
 
So my question is, what do people suggest could be an improvement to the criteria?

Edit: Typo

There are quite a few people who seem to believe that Nationals placements should determine the Olympic team.

In reality that would never happen (now, not in the past). They might go by them most of the time but if Nathan Chen came out and skated 6 minutes of crossovers with no music he’d be going.
 
Well, it's not just "potential" as Ilya scored higher at Nationals than Jason ever has. It kind of trivializes Ilya's accomplishment when you make his potential ceiling sound like something theoretical instead of what he actually put out in an important competition.
It was a National competition. National competitions are higher scoring than International competitions. The USFS counts scores from International competitions. Ilia had one senior international score this year. He scored 222.55
 
Oh for gods sake. As a senior, Jason has an international PB of 274.82, has won nationals and has medaled at 5 others. He’s won silver and bronze at 4CCs and placed in the top 10 at Worlds every time he ever competed there. In 2014 he was one of the youngest men to make the Olympic team and made the final flight for the FS. He’s won 6 challengers / senior Bs and medaled at 4 others. He’s medaled at 10 GPs and qualified for the GPF twice. He also won 2 JGPs and took silver at 3 others, won the JGP and medaled twice at junior worlds.

Remind me of how many of those things Ilia has done? Oh yeah. He has medaled once at senior Nats, won two JGPs, medaled at one Challenger, and placed 5th at Skate America. His highest senior international score to date is 245.35.

Notice any difference?

By the way, to the extent you’re still focused on Ilia’s nationals score, Jason has scored 290 twice. Without a fully rotated quad.

When selecting Jason for 2022 OWG, the USFS should have considered only:
Jason's results from 2022 Nats and 2021 Nats (276.92); his 2021 Worlds results; and his international results from the 2021-22 season.​

The USFS selection criteria exclude the majority of Jason's results listed in Tavi...'s post. Not part of the criteria:
Jason's international PB; his Worlds/Four Continents/GPF/GP/Challenger/Senior B results from 2020 and earlier; his 2014 Olympic results; his Junior Worlds and JGP results.​

My opinion is that I don't think Jason's selection was an overwhelming slam-dunk.
 
The scores are "home cooked" but not the skaters' performances. If Ilya skated his Nationals performances at his Senior B and scored 40 points lower, his international senior mean score would be higher than Jason's. If Ilya then came in 5th at Nationals behind Jason in 3rd, would you have put Ilya on the team?
If if if if. If wishes were horses even beggars would ride.
 
Yeah. One has been 17 for around two months, so he hasn't had any opportunities to not win a GP or 4CC aside from Skate America last year.

I think you missed my main point, which is that despite many people’s dismissive attitude towards him, Jason has accomplished a tremendous amount and performed at a consistently high level. And as I’ve already mentioned to you, more often than not he has performed well under pressure, especially when it comes to obtaining/ retaining Worlds and Olympic spots.

My point with respect to Ilia is not that he should have already medaled at 4CCs, but that aside from his admittedly brilliant performance at Nats, he not only doesn’t have much of a track record, but he hasn’t done particularly well in the two senior international opportunities (Skate America 2020, Cup Austria 2021) he’s already been given. In fact, he scored about 220 both times. He’s undoubtedly got a great career ahead of him but frankly I’m getting a bit tired of the people anointing him as the next dominant force in skating after one good competition.
 
He’s undoubtedly got a great career ahead of him but frankly I’m getting a bit tired of the people anointing him as the next dominant force in skating after one good competition.

I agree it is so excessive. It happens in the women’s all the time (Alysa was our next great hope. Now she’s been tossed aside and it’s Lindsay or Isaheau.
 
Oh for gods sake. As a senior, Jason has an international PB of 274.82, has won nationals and has medaled at 5 others. He’s won silver and bronze at 4CCs and placed in the top 10 at Worlds every time he ever competed there. In 2014 he was one of the youngest men to make the Olympic team and made the final flight for the FS. He’s won 6 challengers / senior Bs and medaled at 4 others. He’s medaled at 10 GPs and qualified for the GPF twice. He also won 2 JGPs and took silver at 3 others, won the JGP and medaled twice at junior worlds.

Remind me of how many of those things Ilia has done? Oh yeah. He has medaled once at senior Nats, won two JGPs, medaled at one Challenger, and placed 5th at Skate America. His highest senior international score to date is 245.35.

Notice any difference?

By the way, to the extent you’re still focused on Ilia’s nationals score, Jason has scored 290 twice. Without a fully rotated quad.
I didn't maintain that Ilia has already achieved a lot of things. But he has the potential to perhaps do it. In the end the top three at Worlds and Olys is the ultimate achievement. Jason will never get it, he showed that multiple times, whereas he has a lot of positive things on his side - a long career, a lot of opportuities to do what he loves, a beautiful way to skate (perhaps pleasing more people than a skate that gains a big medal; that depends). If Ilia will be able to reach for higher goals remains to be seen. But it would be wiser to do everything possible to get him in contention. What Jason did is pretty good on the GP level and puts him in a good position for a professional career. As one may guess ... yes, I'm not a fan of getting very far without a quad in men's (or (recently) women's) skating. Luckily the times one can win a really important medal without quads are over. Ilia is going in the right direction, at least. ... interesting how heated the debate turns immediately ... de facto I only wanted to try out that, usually I don't post in that forum, I don't concur with the general mood here ... of course I like the Eteri factory very much and the Russian way of thinking as well (why aren't you first???- a man without a quad???) ... well, Russian men should do much more in the 4 department, obviously, so THAT's a kind of problematic for them. Yesterday at the press conference the Russian girls were asked about Malinin (4-4). They were impressed, always interested to push boundaries, and talked of some technical plans for the off season (injuries might happen ...). Sasha noticed it was not her achievement to be first with a video like that ... (not so good, obviously; her comment was given in a funny mood) :))) I like Nathan and Yuzu very much, by the way. Great programs and great technical content. And the determination to push forward.
 
When selecting Jason for 2022 OWG, the USFS should have considered only:
Jason's results from 2022 Nats and 2021 Nats (276.92); his 2021 Worlds results; and his international results from the 2021-22 season.​

The USFS selection criteria exclude the majority of Jason's results listed in Tavi...'s post. Not part of the criteria:
Jason's international PB; his Worlds/Four Continents/GPF/GP/Challenger/Senior B results from 2020 and earlier; his 2014 Olympic results; his Junior Worlds and JGP results.​

My opinion is that I don't think Jason's selection was an overwhelming slam-dunk.

Maybe not an overwhelming slam dunk. But my own opinion is that the factors weighed decisively in Jason's favor. The only factor that Ilia "wins" in the ones you cited is 2022 Nats. Jason wins the other three.

Tavi never argued that those scores were part of the criteria.:scratch2: But they are important, at least for me, to counter the argument (not made by you, but made in this thread, and to which Tavi was responding ) that Ilia had a better chance of medaling in this Olympics than Jason.
 
The scores are "home cooked" but not the skaters' performances. If Ilya skated his Nationals performances at his Senior B and scored 40 points lower, his international senior mean score would be higher than Jason's. If Ilya then came in 5th at Nationals behind Jason in 3rd, would you have put Ilya on the team?

Sorry for the double post, I didn't see this until now.

If Ilia skated senior this year, medaled at every comp, scored 20 points higher than Jason, then he would have been in a very different place in the criteria. And if the criteria weighed in his favor, then yes.

But they didn't. And additional points (not saying you said this, but such as I've read) such as "potential" and "quads landed" aren't part of the criteria. I can understand if one believes in his potential and one likes to see flying quads, why one would prefer Ilia. But not why that would make him the choice of the USFS.
 
Back
Top