- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
Because Eteri secretly hates the Russian national anthem and she is trying to make sure it's never played at the Olympics again. Lol
I mean Zagitova/Medvedeva and Lipnitskaia were never positive for any doping in 2018 and 2014.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Eteri secretly hates the Russian national anthem and she is trying to make sure it's never played at the Olympics again. Lol
Ah yes, i had forgot that.Shabotova didn't just say every Russian athlete is doping--she specifically referred to the Eteri girls at Sambo 70 needing to dope to get that good. And it's not partly why she's skating for UKR now, it's the reason. Sad how her Russian career was destroyed for speaking the truth (verified and undeniable at this point) about the Eteri school. Shame on RusFed.
This is returning like a boomerang. She was joking "they are doping with chocolate", but people keep repeating it like she made a serious statement. So no, she did not say "everyone is doping."
Ah. Well, yes social media is indeed the best thing to use to blow up something.The Shabotova case was a 13 year old girl who was doing an instagram q&a with a lot of leading questions. She didn't know what she was talking about. It made an uproar for sure, and yes, it probably destroyed her career within Russia. The whole case was dismissed as nonsense from a naive 13 year old.
The power of social media blew this up to enormous proportions, and still today when people are mentioning Shabotova they associate her name with a drug case that never existed. Which is exactly what happened right here.
Social media speculations almost always become truths.
Oh, well quads at Nationals don't really count for much. It's Nationals and the scoring/tech calling is generous. If Rika were trying some difficult jump that nobody had done at Nationals before, and stayed on her feet, that doesn't mean it would be ratified internationally.Once if I'm not mistaken, at 2020-21 japan nationals.
what came first? the chicken or the egg?LMAO. If they didn't need to win through doping then why the need to dope at all in the first place?![]()
You're enjoying this a bit too much.You know what I haven't been doing since I was 13, or prior to that for that matter?
Taking trimetazidine.
Well that's like asking did athletes know PEDs would help them win prior to competition... or did they take PEDs with the hope of winning more and they suddenly proved to be effective?what came first? the chicken or the egg?
I'm not enjoying anything of this.You're enjoying this a bit too much.
Not in 1968Considering the shipping delays I bet it wouldn't be delivered before the easter. But a glass of beer (or two) can solve that![]()

HANS-GUNNAR LILJENWALL (1968)
Doping control began at the Mexico City Olympics, and Liljenwall's problem sounds quaint compared to modern violations. The modern pentathlete from Sweden lost a bronze medal for alcohol after drinking beer to calm his nerves before the shooting competition.

And instead, they play Tchaikowsky 1st piano concerto, one of the most iconic piece of Russian music.Because Eteri secretly hates the Russian national anthem and she is trying to make sure it's never played at the Olympics again. Lol
OK, words from Eteri:
I bet there will be precise translation soon, but preliminary summary based on my little abilities: do not expect any sensation from it, it's a general summary of the situation.
For me, that's the "there was only one positive test" ... ermm... that just shows how doctors are usually smarter than WADA.If I read/hear/watch one more person claiming trimetazidine doesn't help to get better results, I will throw up.
Where does this epidemy of idiocy come from? Even most hardcore Russian fans at sports.ru are sick of that.
.Thank you for the translation."A very contradictory and complicated situation has arisen. Very many questions and very few answers. I want to say that I am absolutely sure that Kamila is innocent and pure. This is not a theorem for us, but an axiom; it doesn't need to be proven. I understand that there is some kind of protocol of action that we can't do without. We have by no means abandoned the athlete, we are with our athletes in both trouble and joy to the end.
It is very unclear why an athlete with a dubious doping test on December 25 was allowed to participate in the Olympics. Either it is a fatal coincidence, or it is a very clever plan - well, I do not know, or both. I really hope that our leaders will not abandon us, defend our rights and prove our innocence.
Now our whole team is frozen in anticipation of decisions regarding Kamila Valiyeva. We are afraid of any statements, so as not to violate, not to harm. I do not know who decides what, but I hope that justice will be done".
I guess we can't blame Eteri then. Sounds like a win/win situation. Getting caught occasionally means better music when you aren't.And instead, they play Tchaikowsky 1st piano concerto, one of the most iconic piece of Russian music.
Drugs are often not detectable depending on the timeline and the amount taken. It takes only one positive test for a doping sanction.Somehow I still don´t think here is doping involved... As far as I have understood she gave a negative result just before this positive one and also later a negative result. And if it gets proven that she is innocent I will feel very sorry for her as this time must have been awful for her and surely will affect her skating at the competition.
If the attitude is "there are only those who were catched and those who weren't catched yet" then I'm afraid there is nothing to talk about.For me, that's the "there was only one positive test" ... ermm... that just shows how doctors are usually smarter than WADA.
I am not conducting a witch hunt. All I am saying comes from watching documentaries about doping in which WADA explains how behind they are always : there are new drugs, new dosage, new ways to cheat testing etc... and though they are always researching to get ahead, as soon as they make headways, the people who cheat find new ways to cheat. So you will forgive me if I make this comment. One positive test is one too many.If the attitude is "there are only those who were catched and those who weren't catched yet" then I'm afraid there is nothing to talk about.
Well, I fully agree with Eteri in that I am absolutely sure that Kamila is "pure and innocent" and that it's a very unfortunate coincidence that a doping test from 2 months ago was only analyzed now. But I sure do hope just like her that now "justice will be done" for those who have done this to her...*cough*"A very contradictory and complicated situation has arisen. Very many questions and very few answers. I want to say that I am absolutely sure that Kamila is innocent and pure. This is not a theorem for us, but an axiom; it doesn't need to be proven. I understand that there is some kind of protocol of action that we can't do without. We have by no means abandoned the athlete, we are with our athletes in both trouble and joy to the end.
It is very unclear why an athlete with a dubious doping test on December 25 was allowed to participate in the Olympics. Either it is a fatal coincidence, or it is a very clever plan - well, I do not know, or both. I really hope that our leaders will not abandon us, defend our rights and prove our innocence.
Now our whole team is frozen in anticipation of decisions regarding Kamila Valiyeva. We are afraid of any statements, so as not to violate, not to harm. I do not know who decides what, but I hope that justice will be done".