So far I'm trying to follow no presumption (having my opinions aside), but usually the simplest answer is the truth. Even if Putin ordered itI do agree that this person has to follow consequences. But are we following 'presumption of guilt' here? Or 'presumption of innocence'?
And why this person is Eteri? And not f.e. Putin? He could have ordered it, why not?
I don't think we'll have any answer on that for a long time IF an investigation is launched, unless CAS announces smth alongside the decision regarding the suspension tommorow