- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
I sort of tried to raise this 19 January arrival point before... It was never suggested that was the actual date. For some reason one Russian official's words were interpreted like it was; but to a Russian speaking person his statement meant sth like: given that the test result was announced 7Feb and assuming that the lab really met the 20 day standard, one might conclude(through calculation)that the sample got to the lab somewhere around 19Jan. The obvious implication of the whole statement was that the official actually doubted the possibility of such a late arrival hinting that the lab took longer than prescribed to analyse that particular sample ( at that point he clearly had no info which emerged later that the lab really acknowledged being slow due to the Covid issues).That's one of the mysteries, I remember an article saying the RUSADA people gave it to the WADA people - or at least their courier ASAP. But the sample itself wasn't receipted by the Swedish lab until 19th January.
If the RUSADA story is true then the sample (and others I guess since they wouldn't send just one) was in the hands of WADA courier and therefore their responsibility. Although there hasn't been anymore info on this.
It is interesting because as I said they would send the sample in lots so what time did all the samples for the rest of the them get receipted. If there's a difference that's a whole new can of worms.
Later RUSADA issued a statement specifying that in January, upon the expiry of the standard 20 day period, it had been informed by the lab of the lab''s failure to meet the deadline; and the lab in their correspondence with RUSADA promised the test results would be available before the end of January (which it ultimately failed to deliver), RUSADA at this point requesting priority for the test due to the urgency of the matter.
I understand all that might be viewed as immaterial, but this rather long-winded explanation of mine was provoked by these Russia sent it late claims)))