- Joined
- Jan 31, 2019
It is a personal bias, I know, but I feel that in singles and ice dance, I can watch a lot of lower level of mastery skaters with a lot of pleasure, because they could bring energy on ice and just substitute easier elements without losing the feel of excellence—I mean, look at Taljegard—but in pairs, the elements are so tied to mastery, that it is hard to watch. And, well, I am also terrified of the higher potential for injury, if the pairs unused to the limelight try to step-up, because pair falls are horrific.There are the facts, and the interpretation of such facts
I presented some facts too... some Canadian pair teams who have all the same elements as the top teams who didn't get to attend the GPs last year... these teams do not do lower level lifts and double throws. I am looking forward to seeing them on the circuit.
Regarding your experience at Skate America, good you enjoyed it. In general, the biggest point gaps come in the singles discipline, not in pairs or dance as teams have more or less the same elements...
The GP I attended saw Trusova with almost 100 points over the last place finisher Veronik Mallet.
In the men division, Hanyu had about 60 points over the second place finisher Nam Nguyen and about 130 over last place finisher Kerry.
Pairs and dance, with the main contenders from the elite 50 points from the top to the last place... much more homogeneous.
So remove a few top pairs in the pairs division, I believe that the field overall will be weaker of course, but the gap, not so much widened.
I dunno. I feel that I am going to go and cheer anyway, but I would have preferred GP to stick to the ‘best of the best’ idea under these trying circumstances.
Do you think they will put Nadau in this season? I want to see how he does as a pair skater.
Last edited:

