By the numbers...
Well, the only way to settle it “scientifically and objectively” is with a “code of points.”
Worlds = 13 points – your placement
Four Continents = 7 points – your placement (none of the top contenders for this award competed at 4Cs this year.)
GP Final = 6 points – your placement (might seem low compared to 4C’s, but you already have points from your individual events just to get there.)
Individual GP event = 4 points – your placement
U.S. Nationals = 7 points – your placement (this
is a U.S. contest, after all

)
So the maximum you can get is 35.
Juniors: 60% of seniors (I would have said 50%, but juniors can’t get points for 4C’s.)
Men.
Weir: 10 + 0 + 2 + 6 + 5 =
23
Rippon: 12* + 0 + 5* + 5* + 6* =
16.8
Ladies.
Nagasu: 10* + 0 + 5* + 6* + 6 =
18.6
Flatt: 12* + 0 + 4* + 5* + 5 =
17.6
Zhang: 11* + 0 + 2 + 3 + 3 =
14.6
Dance.
Belbin and Agosto (last year’s winner of this award): 9 + 0 + 4 + 6 + 6 =
25
Samuelson and Bates: 12* + 0 + 4* + 6* + 3 =
16.2
Pairs: MacLaughlin and Brubaker did not complete at worlds; no pairs team is really in the running.
Synchro: The Haydenetts (former winner of this prize, tied with Sasha Cohen) won U.S. nationals and finished fifth at worlds. I’m not sure how to rate this discipline. (However, if all the family and friends of all the synchro teams out there all vote, synchro may have an advantage in this “readers’ choice” format. :yes: )
So there you go. By the numbers, in spite of evereything, it’s Belbin and Agosto!
