Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they nullify Kamila's team points, it isn't just a matter of subtracting 20 points from 74 to get 54 and thus beat Canada (who had a total of 53). If Kamila's results don't count, then it's as though only 9 women competed in the short and 4 women in the FS. Madeline then gets 9 points in the SP (for finishing 2nd behind Wakaba) and 8 points in the FS (for finishing 2nd behind Kaori). Canada gets 56 and gets the BronzeNow that Valieva's results for Beijing have been disqualified, the next big thing will be how IOC distributes the medals.
If ONLY Valieva's team points are nullified, then there's a reshuffling of the top three. Could happen, as it might be fairer to the clean (as far as we know) Russian team members.
If the entire team is disqualified, Canada moves to the podium. This is my prediction.
The least likely scenario, IMO, is that the gold medal is left vacant and everything else stays as it is.
There's one more possibility. Valieva's points are nullified and all the other women get one more point (because it's as if she didn't skate). In that case, Canada is third and ROC is fourth. If only Valieva is DQd, this is how it should be done. A DQd skater can't place above the other skaters.Now that Valieva's results for Beijing have been disqualified, the next big thing will be how IOC distributes the medals.
If ONLY Valieva's team points are nullified, then there's a reshuffling of the top three. Could happen, as it might be fairer to the clean (as far as we know) Russian team members.
If the entire team is disqualified, Canada moves to the podium. This is my prediction.
The least likely scenario, IMO, is that the gold medal is left vacant and everything else stays as it is.
I agree. I think the easiest thing to do is just disqualify the OAR team and not mess around with the points at all, just move the placements up.I think the entire team will be d/q. I don't see how the IOC can make any other decision.
I know that people would be thrilled for Maddie getting a medal because she skated so well at the team event or for Roman because he is such a special skater and that may boost his vision on things... but I would be most happy for Piper and Paul getting an Olympic medal.
recalculating is not something done very often... it's usually D/Q. The question is do they D/Q just her or the whole team. I think the IOC will not want to award a medal to ROC at this point as this case has received already so much attention.I agree. I think the easiest thing to do is just disqualify the OAR team and not mess around with the points at all, just move the placements up.
While there is a small chance that Russia retains a bronze, I think that scenario is the least likely by far. There's a lot of mental gymnastics you'd have to do to get there and it makes the least amount of sense of all the alternatives.
It also seems most consistent with how other team situations have been treated in the past.recalculating is not something done very often... it's usually D/Q. The question is do they D/Q just her or the whole team. I think the IOC will not want to award a medal to ROC at this point as this case has received already so much attention.
Why shouldn't they D/Q the entire team? The US has had track relay teams lose their Olympics medals because one of their sprinters popped hot in a drug test.recalculating is not something done very often... it's usually D/Q. The question is do they D/Q just her or the whole team. I think the IOC will not want to award a medal to ROC at this point as this case has received already so much attention.
I agree they should D/Q the entire team. There are cases where it hasn't been the case in team sports... never in relays.. but the team event is not a relay. So it's tricky. The ISU has to establish the ranking.. we will see what they do. (per Christine Brennan tweet... it's in the thread about KV news...)Why shouldn't they D/Q the entire team? The US has had track relay teams lose their Olympics medals because one of their sprinters popped hot in a drug test.
Yeah, what a decision. Kind of bizarre really. Think about it: what athlete wants to be a part of a medal ceremony right now with the Russian team? Awkward.Dumb attempt at creating a compromise with Russia, that Russia predictably rejected anyway.
What did you want them to do ?I have to wonder what steps did Skate Canada take to advocate for their clean athletes prior to this ISU ruling?
The statement they've issued now is correct, but they've done it late and now they have to reverse a standing ruling - rather than getting in front if the issue and standing up for their skaters. They've seemed passive until now, at least publicly.
I love Canadian skaters, and I love my Canadian GS friends, but dang... I'm not impressed with your federation. And that is saying a lot, considering how USFSA has mismanaged some of their issues.
The ISU's policy blatantly states that skaters move up a placement after an athlete is DSQ. Wakaba Higuchi deserves 10 points for winning the SP segment, not 9 for coming in second over an athlete who was found to have committed a doping violation. They moved athletes up in the individual events, and the team event should be no different. Canada should have won that bronze medal if the ISU actually followed their own rulebook, and I hope that SkateCanada and the Canadian Olympic Committee challenge the decision.
EDIT:
Hopefully this will help.
I believe the IOC said they would in this case follow the ISU ruling.Is this an ISU ruling or IOC. Bc IOC doesn't needs to follow ISU rules, like their citizenship rule for dance/pairs. It's still a bad move regardless of organization but if it's IOC ruling, ISU doesn't have much say.
It may be the morally right thing to do to advocate before the ruling, but not the legally right thing to do. Up until the ruling, Skate Canada was likely told by their lawyers that they didn't have a legal leg to stand on. They didn't win any medals and there hadn't been any verdict, so they would have to wait until there was something.I have to wonder what steps did Skate Canada take to advocate for their clean athletes prior to this ISU ruling?
The statement they've issued now is correct, but they've done it late and now they have to reverse a standing ruling - rather than getting in front if the issue and standing up for their skaters. They've seemed passive until now, at least publicly.
I love Canadian skaters, and I love my Canadian GS friends, but dang... I'm not impressed with your federation. And that is saying a lot, considering how USFSA has mismanaged some of their issues.