In my opinion, she got a good deal not being provisionally suspended until the hearing.. That would really have meant 4 years without skating.. now, only what 22 months to go? She's very lucky.
It was nice she got to skate while she waited for the hearing. But I think one of the reasons they gave out 4 years is because she was skating for those 2 years already. AKA if she had been suspended immediately, there's a good chance it would have only been 2 years handed out at the hearing.
With this being such a high profile case, I'm sure there was a ton of pressure on them to not appear "too soft" on Russia
(because of war and previous doping scandal). So they gave her "4 years" so she would at least be truly NOT skating for 2 years of them. If she had gotten a "slap on the wrist" and only banned for 2 years, then she would never have stopped skating at all and people would be constantly complaining about the fact she never truly stopped skating as being "too lenient" on Russia.
People were super excited that she would be banned from skating for 2 actual years
(even tho its largely symbolic since Russia can't compete internationally anyway to this day), but then a lot of people were horrified to learn "not skating" also means she can't even train in most rinks or skate in shows. A lot people thought being "banned" just meant competition and nothing else. So I think there are some mixed feelings about the ban because of that, even from people who wanted her banned. They understand that not even being able to train for 2 years will end her career.
Personally, I think the lab did its job in terms of testing the sample. Kamila's lawyers would have gotten the case thrown out if the testing was faulty. And I think it's pretty far-fetched to think someone at the lab would deliberately try to sabotage her sample, whether they knew it was hers or not. It's easier to believe someone in Russia fed her contaminated food as sabotage than to believe the lab in Sweden would do something to her.
The only thing that "isn't fair" is how long the lab took to return the result AND that Russia isn't more careful with how they select their Olympic team. I've said this before: If labs can't be trusted to get results back on time, Russia needs to have a policy of not selecting anyone for an event if they have outstanding tests. Russia should make sure tests come back if they really are running an amazing behind-the-scenes doping program and don't want to get caught OR they should do this to try to keep from losing face internationally if they are innocent.
It's like Russia doesn't even care at all about saving face, whether they are innocent or guilty. They'd rather someone get caught and then have to waste tons of money on lawyers trying to argue and keep the medal from being stripped. It would be way more efficient to catch people who are contaminated before you send them to events, because again, that helps Russia keep medals regardless of what is or isn't going on behind the scenes.
I don't get it at all that Russia is so blasé about stuff like this. I don't take that as a sign of "guilt", but as the people running the joint having no brains at all and that everything is being run haphazardly.
As far as the reallocation of points, I think Russia might keep bronze because the rules are poorly written. I'm sure ISU will clear up and rewrite the rules for the future after all of this is finally finished.
Maybe ISU gave Russia bronze a
s "sorry we gave Kamila 4 years and sorry the lab results were so late that your team selections were poor", but I think its really that the rules are poorly written and this is what their lawyers said they needed to do. I'm sure the ISU expected appeals and not everyone to just quietly accept it. ISU chose what they think will hold up in court against those appeals.