2025-26 Single and Pairs GOE and PC | Golden Skate

2025-26 Single and Pairs GOE and PC

gsk8

🎗️AA5342🎗️
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Communication No. 2701

Single and Pair Skating for Season 2025/26
Levels of Difficulty and Guidelines for marking Grade of Execution and Program Components

I. Updated Levels of Difficulty of Single/Pair Skating Elements
II. Updated Guidelines for marking +GOE of Single/Pair Skating Elements (positive aspects)
III. Updated Guidelines in establishing GOE for errors in Short Program and Free Skating
IV. Changes and clarifications for GOE and Program Components
 
Are we ready for a barrage of 136 degree illusion spins? :)

"Windmill ((illusion) is considered as a difficult movement for a feature only if it reaches close to a split position (at least
135 degrees)."
 
Are we ready for a barrage of 136 degree illusion spins? :)

"Windmill ((illusion) is considered as a difficult movement for a feature only if it reaches close to a split position (at least
135 degrees)."
They removed it as a difficult entry/exit last year, so no worries about judges going frame by frame with a protractor (y) That reduced the number of them since that's where they were commonly used.
 
Some of the changes:

Singles (changes underlined)
Level of difficulty all spins:
12) Difficult blade feature in camel, sit, Layback, Biellmann or difficult variation of an upright position

Changes and clarifications on spins:
Difficult blade feature: using the blade in a way that has a significant impact on the balance, control and execution of
the spin. The feature must be executed in camel, sit, Layback, Biellmann or difficult variation of an upright position. The
position must be maintained throughout the whole feature
and can be achieved for example by spinning on the heel or
toe of the blade. The feature must be performed in control inside the spin and spinning must continue after the feature.
The difficult blade feature is not considered as a difficult exit.


Pairs (changes underlined)
Levels of Difficulty
Lifts:
1) Seniors: Difficult variation of the take-off and difficult landing variety
Juniors: Difficult variation of the take-off or difficult landing variety
2) 1 change of hold and/or woman’s position (1 rev. of the man before and after the change, counts twice if repeated)
3) Difficult variation of the woman (1 full revolution)
4) Difficult carry (only for Senior Free Skating)
5) Seniors: Difficult one-hand-hold of the man (2 full revolutions in total not counting parts shorter than 1 rev.)
Juniors: one-hand-hold of the man (2 full revolutions in total not counting parts shorter than 1 rev.)
6) Additional revolutions of the man with one-hand-hold after 2 revs in 5) (only in Free Skating and only in one lift)
7) Change of rotational direction by the man (1 rev. before and after the change, counts only once per program)
Features 1), 2), 3), 5) must be significantly different from lift to lift and if similar, will only count first time
attempted. All the features can be counted if executed in the first 4 revolutions.

Solo Spins:
10) Difficult blade feature in camel, sit, Layback, Biellmann or difficult variation of an upright position

Changes and Clarifications:
Twist Lifts
The Woman must be caught in the air at the waist by the Man prior to landing and be assisted to a smooth landing on
the ice on a backward outside edge on one foot.
(this part was removed)
The difficult exit may be executed before the landing of the woman or immediately after it.

Solo Spins
Difficult blade feature: using the blade in a way that has a significant impact on the balance, control and execution of
the spin. The feature must be executed in camel, sit, Layback, Biellmann or difficult variation of an upright position. The
position must be maintained throughout the whole feature
and can be achieved for example by spinning on the heel or
toe of the blade. The feature must be performed in control inside the spin and spinning must continue after the feature.
The difficult blade feature is not considered as a difficult exit.


Pair Spin:
Lifting the woman while the man is on 1 foot is a level feature when executed for at least 2 revolutions in a fixed
position. If the woman is in a difficult position during the lift, it will be counted as a difficult variation. When the woman
is lifted, the definition of an upright position is based on the position of the torso and not the legs.


Reductions in GOE (these are all additions)
Singles:

Steps:
Partly or fully does not correspond to the music -1 to -4

Choreographic Sequence:
Partly or fully does not correspond to the music -1 to -4
Does not highlight choreography -1 to -3

Pairs
Jump Elements, Throw Jumps
FS: Jump with no value in combo/seq (not with *) -3 to -4

Steps:
Partly or fully does not correspond to the music -1 to -4

Choreographic Sequence:
Partly or fully does not correspond to the music -1 to -4
Does not highlight choreography -1 to -3

GOE evaluation (both Pairs and Singles)
(most text is added, any changes to existing text have been underlined)

In case of any of the following errors, the starting GOE for the evaluation cannot be higher than +2:
Jump with no value in combo/seq (not with *) – Free Skating
Unequal number of revolutions by partners in 1 or more jumps
Multiple errors in any element (e.g. in a jump element both “!” and “<”, in a spin element slowing down and traveling)

Spins:
The GOE reduction for poor fly and/or incorrect take-off or landing applies to both flying spins and spins with a flying
entrance. In this case the maximum starting GOE is +2 and the reduction is -2 to -3

Choreo Sequence:
Does not highlight choreography: The movements should reflect and support the composition of the program.

Lifts:
If a two foot take-off is done as part of a difficult entry, no reduction for starting on two feet is needed. The judges still
evaluate the quality of the take-off even if two foot take-off is allowed.


There was also wording changes, unaesthetic has now become awkward.

Edit: Since I'm still seeing in other places claims that certain elements of PCS have been removed due to a selective screenshot taken off a fansite, there have been no removals of any PCS elements in the rules. It's the same as it was for the 2024-25 season.
 
Last edited:
Difficult blade feature: using the blade in a way that has a significant impact on the balance, control and execution of
the spin.
I have always had misgivings about this kind of language. Surely using a blade position that throws you off balance, makes you lose control and leaves you unable to execute the move -- that can't be good.

I suppose that the point is to encourage skaters to make the spin more difficult by tempting fate in this way/ I guess nit is a feather in your cap if you can recover your balance, regain control, etc. Still it seems like funny wording to me.
 
I have always had misgivings about this kind of language. Surely using a blade position that throws you off balance, makes you lose control and leaves you unable to execute the move -- that can't be good.

I suppose that the point is to encourage skaters to make the spin more difficult by tempting fate in this way/ I guess nit is a feather in your cap if you can recover your balance, regain control, etc. Still it seems like funny wording to me.
Most of the changes for 2025-26 seemed to be about clarifying the difficult blade position. They added it last season, so I wouldn't be surprised if they adjust the wording on it again. Maybe not to the point of adding "must have 45 degrees on heel spin for difficulty to be counted" yet.
 
I don't know where to ask this question and am unsure how to begin a topic, so am asking it here in hopes I'm not breaking a rule by doing so. My question has to do with how GOEs and PCs are shown in skaters' protocols. I will focus on single skaters only for now.

Realizing not all competitions have the same number of judges per event, I will use the 2026 Olympics as an example. There are 9 judges, and always 9 GOEs are shown. It was my understanding that the highest and lowest GOE for each element would be thrown out--is that still the case or not?

Even more baffling is, only 8 sets of PCs are shown. Why not 9, reflecting a set of PCs for each judge? Are any PCs thrown out, and if so, why the discrepancy between the number of judges (9), the number of GOES (9--1 for each judge) but only 8 PCs? I am unable to find this information anywhere.

I would appreciate any information regarding this. Thank you.
 
I don't know where to ask this question and am unsure how to begin a topic, so am asking it here in hopes I'm not breaking a rule by doing so. My question has to do with how GOEs and PCs are shown in skaters' protocols. I will focus on single skaters only for now.

Realizing not all competitions have the same number of judges per event, I will use the 2026 Olympics as an example. There are 9 judges, and always 9 GOEs are shown. It was my understanding that the highest and lowest GOE for each element would be thrown out--is that still the case or not?

Even more baffling is, only 8 sets of PCs are shown. Why not 9, reflecting a set of PCs for each judge? Are any PCs thrown out, and if so, why the discrepancy between the number of judges (9), the number of GOES (9--1 for each judge) but only 8 PCs? I am unable to find this information anywhere.

I would appreciate any information regarding this. Thank you.
Are you looking at the men's sp protocols from today? I see 9 PCS there.


Yes, the highest and lowest scores for each GOE and each component are not calculated into the averaging. But all the scores are shown on the protocols.
 
Last edited:
Are you looking at the men's sp protocols from today? I see 9 PCS there.


Yes, the highest and lowest scores for each GOE and each component are not calculated into the averaging. But all the scores are shown on the protocols.
Thank you--when I look at your link, it clearly does show 9 sets of PCs. Earlier when I checked the protocols via the Results link found on the first page of the OP, the PCs didn't show this way. Instead, they showed 8 instead of 9 sets of PCs and they were not lined up correctly under the judges' GOEs, either. Just another of life's little mysteries, I guess.
 
Thank you--when I look at your link, it clearly does show 9 sets of PCs. Earlier when I checked the protocols via the Results link found on the first page of the OP, the PCs didn't show this way. Instead, they showed 8 instead of 9 sets of PCs and they were not lined up correctly under the judges' GOEs, either. Just another of life's little mysteries, I guess.
Could it be that you saw the live "provisional" scoring? Not all judges submit their PCS by the time when provisional scores are displayed.
 
Could it be that you saw the live "provisional" scoring? Not all judges submit their PCS by the time when provisional scores are displayed.
Yes, I guess that must be it. Frankly the only protocols I ever see are those shown by clicking on the Results link in an event's OP. Where can I find the real, finished protocols? Or are those actually complete and correct, after some period of time? I learn something new every day.
 
Yes, I guess that must be it. Frankly the only protocols I ever see are those shown by clicking on the Results link in an event's OP. Where can I find the real, finished protocols? Or are those actually complete and correct, after some period of time? I learn something new every day.
You can find them in the ISU Event page (it must be the Results link in the OP) under "Judges' Scores (pdf)".

I don't know exactly how much time it takes to add the detailed protocols there. I mostly look them up the next day or so but I'm guessing that they are added sooner. Maybe other forumers can help us with more precise information 🙏
 
You can find them in the ISU Event page (it must be the Results link in the OP) under "Judges' Scores (pdf)".

I don't know exactly how much time it takes to add the detailed protocols there. I mostly look them up the next day or so but I'm guessing that they are added sooner. Maybe other forumers can help us with more precise information 🙏
The protocols are usually published on ISU's site very quickly after the event is over, 15 minutes or so, sometimes even less.
 
Back
Top