I prefer to listen to skaters and commentators that were skaters. Their opinions mean a little more to me as far as what's going on in the skating world. I respect Kurt Browning a lot and he said after D/W's FD that he totally bought into their expression and romantic feel of their program. I think that says a lot. He and Tracy were definitely pulling for V/M, so I think their comments on D/W were genuine and you could tell that they respected what D/W did out there. Yes, the scores were close, but there was no wuzrobbing for V/M. Kurt said it..they made mistakes at the wrong time..on key elements. Which can't be done if you expect to get the levels. I think their commentating was fair and it was nice (to this D/W fan) that D/W got the respect from the Canadians.
Well said. Kurt is really growing on me. Too bad US TV lost him to CBC. He's quite good and far more restrained than most American commentators. (BTW, he made some very insightful points about the men's free skate that may help to settle debate elsewhere in the forums.) Tracy is excellent and NBC should use her far more than they do now at the Olympics next year. She provides far more substance than Scott and Sandra combined.
The Eurosport team is excellent. I was watching US Nationals on ESPN the other day - I think it was Nancy Kerrigan + someone - and realized how lucky I am to get most of my figure skating coverage from ES. I also understood why people are having such a hard time understanding CoP in the US: nobody was even trying to explain how the elements were being scored and what the skaters were doing to get levels and GOEs.
I agree. I always enjoy hearing their commentary and prefer it to most of the US standard. Any failing of the current judging system as far as audience comprehension should be laid squarely at the feet of the current US broadcasters. From graphic displays for scores to depth of knowledge about how the system works, the vast majority of US TV coverage is sorely lacking.

Someone agree with me

