- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
... after VancouverMaybe I go to Tallin and I ll go with a spaghetti menu!![]()

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... after VancouverMaybe I go to Tallin and I ll go with a spaghetti menu!![]()

Well, since I spoke to Tomas about Plushenko personally at TEB and also other occasions, maybe I can add something. I wasn't at the press conference myself and I had this written by someone else, and I was already afraid some small parts would stirr up something...I would be curious to see a transcript of the news conference to get a better idea of the context and Verner's actual comments. In the report, some things are quoted directly and some are paraphrased, so I'm not really sure what he was getting at.
"I saw his skates on video. On the technical side he was very well prepared. If you look at his jumps he was at 100%. But if I look at the other parts of the skate, I think he is still losing and it wasn't "all that" yet. but he had a certain advantage by the judges because of his previous success. Maybe things will change with time"
Thanks for the additional info. I still wish the guys wouldn't complain about each other's marks (it's not just Tomas), but it's good to have a bit more context.Entire post
Tomas, if he skates his programs as he's capable of doing, is not only a match for all the current top guys - he is quite possibly better than them. The problem, of course, is that he tends towards Hidden Czech skates. As for 2008 Worlds, this is similar to Caro Kostner in 2009: just because the jumps aren't there doesn't mean the PCS necessarily has to suffer; jumps are reflected in the TES, and it's possible to have great skating skills and do the planned choreo and interpret the music well even without them. Personally, I have erased that skate from my memory so I can't comment further. My thoughts on Verner's comments appear here.I guess he might forgot how much he was boosted at 2008 Worlds by the judges in terms of PCS when he fell apart in his LP.
BTW, what is the press conference for? In response to Plushenko's opening show?
No, in this case. He never said always, or at big events., Neither did I and neither does he compare himself with any other skater (because personally, I know he would never daaaarrreee to compare himself to Plushenko!!), or say something about how he has been judged in the past. Maybe he also thinks he was held up in 2008? Do you know?I think Verner should lodge a formal complaint to ISU about Plushenko's inflated scores at RC instead of grumbling at a press conference. Verner does think Plushenko's past glory always puts him in an advantageous position over other strong competitors at big events? To be frank, I never consider him to be a match with such skaters as Brian, Stephane, Oda and Chan, let alone Plushenko. I guess he might forgot how much he was boosted at 2008 Worlds by the judges in terms of PCS when he fell apart in his LP.
BTW, what is the press conference for? In response to Plushenko's opening show?

Tomas, if he skates his programs as he's capable of doing, is not only a match for all the current top guys - he is quite possibly better than them. The problem, of course, is that he tends towards Hidden Czech skates. As for 2008 Worlds, this is similar to Caro Kostner in 2009: just because the jumps aren't there doesn't mean the PCS necessarily has to suffer; jumps are reflected in the TES, and it's possible to have great skating skills and do the planned choreo and interpret the music well even without them. Personally, I have erased that skate from my memory so I can't comment further.
I'll repeat: jump content is reflected in the TES. It is possible to have crap jumps and still do great choreo and transitions.With regard to PCS, "just because the jumps aren't there doesn't mean the PCS necessarily has to suffer", if skating programs are to be rated this way in the near future, it will be the end of this sport, doubtless! You see what sport really means?
I'll repeat: jump content is reflected in the TES. It is possible to have crap jumps and still do great choreo and transitions.
Yes it looks too ideal though..ok about choreo and transitions, but falling on your butt doesnt it ruin though the whole appearance of the program, presentation, flow, the interpretation mark for example?
I have no idea, I m just asking..
Plushenko just reached among the top too early and there was a big hype around his name back then and judges are judging him for a decade now. As dick button have said He gives them what they want, he doesnt disappoint them and they reward him for that, whatever that means..

lushenko is neither a quad king nor a jumping machine. He just sells his programs in a thrilling and splashing way. Such power, such passion, indescribable, and incomparable. Simply great!![]()


Maybe it is wiser for Tomas not to comment about other skaters - but he was only stating the obvious.
Wow you and Nadine are really taking my crown of best plushy fan
I never said he was the quad king or jumping machine, are you sure you need to explain that to me?
Oh but he is just the King, lol! For many many things but mostly for me for having a little star above his mullet of a great sportsman, I m still in my pink cloud after Rostel, please be patient with me, I will get down at some point
Jntfan being the Plushenko was not always as easy as it sounds.
What do you think is the correct evaluation on his programs, then?

Just for curiosity's sake, How is 6,95 obviously not a good mark?
Please God, dont let Ant answer this question![]()
So do you want his PCS (transition mark) to be lower or higher?
Lambiel FS 2005 Worlds 76,86
Lambiel FS 2006 Worlds 77,88
Joubert FS 2007 Worlds 76,64
Buttle FS 2008 Worlds 78,78
Plushy FS Rostelcom 2009 76,80
These are Worlds scores, Rostelcom is an early season GP.
Why is 76,80 PCS a bad score for the reigning OGM holder at a GP?