That's right, Rain. As I said in an earlier post, I find that idea pleasing. I don't know whether it's overconfidence or faith in the usefulness of the language of Shakespeare and Bill Gates, but we seem to think that people who come to live here will end up fluent in English, whether or not they retain their family language as well. Statistics show that this hope is not misplaced: by the third generation, most immigrants are fluent in English. Many of them are fluent in the first generation, in fact. I'm sure this trend of linguistic assimilation is true in other countries that accept immigrants as well.
I have another question about Chinese languages. Since they are tonal languages, is that an impediment for deaf people to learn to communicate by voice? In our country there are two schools of thought about how the deaf should learn communication: by signing or by vocal speech. Some learn just one by preference, some learn both--but technically, any deaf person who wants to learn spoken English (or French, or Italian, or Greek, and so on) certainly can. What is the situation for Chinese? Is it even possible to learn vocal speech? If so, how is it done?
I have another question about Chinese languages. Since they are tonal languages, is that an impediment for deaf people to learn to communicate by voice? In our country there are two schools of thought about how the deaf should learn communication: by signing or by vocal speech. Some learn just one by preference, some learn both--but technically, any deaf person who wants to learn spoken English (or French, or Italian, or Greek, and so on) certainly can. What is the situation for Chinese? Is it even possible to learn vocal speech? If so, how is it done?
Last edited:
