Both two-foot and fallen landings are imperfect landings. Two footed landings are incomplete landing whereas a fall can be after a completed landing so all that is missing is the flowing out, which of course is also missing from a 2 footed landing. ISU sets the rules and one can complain about all kinds of unfairness, e.g. UR and 2-footed landing is worth the same as fully rotated and 2-footed landing, and all falls from a jump are worth the same value regardless how many faults are committed in the jump.
In all sports and games, participants go by the rules, which they have all the time to study.
Yes, but many sports seem to have more logical rules than CoP skating.
When a gymnast falls off the beam it is not treated like a bobble or balance check. It is treated as a more serious mistake....because it is
Fans in turn can see this and I might add without instant replay.
You are right that rules govern a sport.
But I watched for many years where a fall was always treated as a more serious and disruptive mistake than some two footed landings or a borderline UR.
When fans couldn't understand why great freeskaters were losing to poor freeskaters due to the weighting of the figures ISU adjusted the scoring.
Fans flocked to arenas and TV ratings were strong.
Today I see skating in a similar situation.
The average fan has no idea why Chan is so great. He might as well be Trixie Schuba for all that average fans can tell about his skating.
Dai is different and is a skating superstar due to his exceptional performance abilties.
Fans don't get it when he loses if the other guy fell or skated through the music....or even behind it.
I think ISU ignores the fans at their peril.