- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
Just because Blue questions whether homosexuality is a question of choice or genetic, and supports the view that marriage is sacred between a man and woman, does not make Blue homophobic. Did Blue advocate violence against those who do not conform to her traditional views of gender? Why can’t she question the views of others without being branded homophobic? Why must we take political correctness to the extreme? Is it wrong to adopt ideas slowly and at one’s pace? I fail to see why branding anyone who take a traditional and cautious approach homophobic is going to make that person change his/her outlook. We are all brought up in different environment. Don’t expect everyone to think alike.
I think Blue is going beyond questioning homosexuality as a choice/genetic or saying she thinks marriage should be between a man and woman (even though the inability to get married would disenfranchise many LGBT couples essentially making them second-class citizens).
She's said "good on Russia!" which essentially means she condones these severely homophobic laws that Putin has implemented; worse, like others who are drinking the Kool-Aid, she thinks it's actually protecting children when it's really just a wide-scale effort to demonize and disenfranchise LGBT people.