- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
200+ pages and still nobody can answer this.
Would you be so kind as to answer it for us. I'm very curious as to how you know which judges gave which skaters what scores and why.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
200+ pages and still nobody can answer this.
Or this.
Blah, blah, blah. According to Tarasova, all the skaters except the Russians were overscored. So what else is new?
Order the book of Beverly Smith which was published post Nagano, and then the other on Sale Pelletier published post SLC, and you will exactly what I am talking about.
How can a skater who deserved 4 world titles and 2 Olympic golds in their career and won only 2 world titles and 1 Olympic gold be overscored.
After calling Kim's program "old fashioned." Irony at its best.time for the grandkids to start looking for a home to put her in, i think she's finally gone senile
time for the grandkids to start looking for a home to put her in, i think she's finally gone senile
thank goodness, someone finally said it
Kim was overscored throught her career though ome had basis for her inflated marks skating cleanly of course
How can a skater who deserved 4 world titles and 2 Olympic golds in their career and won only 2 world titles and 1 Olympic gold be overscored.
I think the only area Yu-Na was overscored was in Transitions. TAT makes a fair point about the intricacies of the transitions and linking moves in Adelina's program versus Yu-Na's. Adelina's program is very busy with transitions into and out of everything while Yu-Na's has transitions but not as many and not as difficult/intricate.
I actually find both Yu-Na and Carolina to be overscored in transitions. Just count the consecutive crossovers compared to others. They often receive top scores in this category though both deserve to be lower than a number of skaters, including Mao.
How? Look at Chan...can you say that he deserved his last two world titles?
How can a skater who deserved 4 world titles and 2 Olympic golds in their career and won only 2 world titles and 1 Olympic gold be overscored. In hindsight it seems Kim was probably one of the most underscored skaters in history as I cant think of many skaters who deserved twice the Olympic/World titles as they were allowed. Her 3 actual Olympic and World golds were also unquestionable with it being impossible to even make a remote case for anyone else. Anytime it was remotedly close she lost, no matter who it was against, showing she was the judges least favorite of all the top skaters.
I would say in the aftermath of her career she was the most underscored skater since Lu Chen who in fact deserved 4 world/Olympic golds but was only allowed 1.
Transitions or not just about how many you have but about how well and smoothly they are done. In any case the judges don't differentiate the PCS, they are all marked the same relatively. Which is why PCS becomes pointless. Sasha was given the highest scores for skating skills, even though her skating skills were garbage compared to Irina, Shizuka, or even Fumie or Michelle. All because she was great in the other 4. Chan is giving the highest in interpretation and performance, even when Takahashi was at his peak. There is no point having separate categories.
I didn't say anything about Chan in this thread now did I.