Sooorry, my mistake

So, who's left? It looks like all the Senior available couples are in the GP already
Well, nearly.
Current pairs substitution list...????
SB 39: Cherniavskaia/Souza-Kordyeru
SB 44: Wang/Zhang
SB 45: Ziegler/Kiefer (TEB)** last pair to meet the total minimums
SB 50: Pakliakova/Bochkov
SB 51: Fancy/Boyadji
P/B and F/B do not meet the total minimums but should qualify based on TES minimums. Cernuschi/Ambrosini were above both those teams on the SB list, but didn't meet the TES minimums. They have a chance to earn either the TES minimum or total minimum at Nebelhorn... if they get it, would they bump someone off the list? Do they have to win Nebelhorn? etc. They're in a weird position, already on the SB list and theoretically in the stop 5 substitution list, but without the minimums.
There are a number of unanswered questions in my mind about how the Challenger Series events affect the replacement list. I don't find the part of the GP announcement that AlexRus quotes to be entirely clear, particularly the second and third clauses...
I *think* the only other couple below Fancy/Boyadji who met the TES minimums is Pak/Song, but someone can double-check and correct me.
Calalang/Sidhu met the GP total minimum at US International Classic, with a higher score than anyone currently on the top 5 substitution list, but it's unclear to me if that could place them on the list below Pak/Song, or if they had to actually WIN the event to be placed on the list.