- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
Here is the document (Communication 1631 -- there may be a newer one.)
http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=1951
The procedures are explained in great detail, but not the penalties. Section I says that the most extreme situation (Assessment level 4) carries penalties of "demotion or suspension." Demotion could mean something like, you can still judge lesser events but not ISU championships.
The whole process is under the direction of the Vice President for Figure Skating (David Dore, CAN), and final decisions are made by the ISU council. My impression is that specific penalties are assigned on a case by case basis.
Note the provision that everyone involved in the evaluation procedure is sworn to silence about particular individuals. I guess they don't want to air their laundry in public.
I also see that the typical ISU judge is paid 40 Euros per day for service at ISU championships, plus a bonus of 500 Euros at the end of the year. They have to pay it back if they are demoted or suspended at the end of the season.
http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=1951
The procedures are explained in great detail, but not the penalties. Section I says that the most extreme situation (Assessment level 4) carries penalties of "demotion or suspension." Demotion could mean something like, you can still judge lesser events but not ISU championships.
The whole process is under the direction of the Vice President for Figure Skating (David Dore, CAN), and final decisions are made by the ISU council. My impression is that specific penalties are assigned on a case by case basis.
Note the provision that everyone involved in the evaluation procedure is sworn to silence about particular individuals. I guess they don't want to air their laundry in public.
I also see that the typical ISU judge is paid 40 Euros per day for service at ISU championships, plus a bonus of 500 Euros at the end of the year. They have to pay it back if they are demoted or suspended at the end of the season.