mzheng said:
From SinaSport's S&Z's coach said they lost to T&M not because of Shen's falling, Zhao's mistakes, or two less elements; but because of the caller calls a level 3 lift as level 2 thus 4 points less for that element.
Since they only had 1 L2 lift in their SC LP, which was a group 6, and their SP lift was graded at Group 4 Level 3, I'm assuming he would have been talking about that one.
Here are the ranges for Group 6:
Group 6 Level I: 5.0, 5.4, 5.7,
6.0, 6.7, 7.4, 8
Group 6 Level II: 5.5, 5.9, 6.2,
6.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5
Group 6 Level III: 6.0, 6.4, 6.7,
7.0, 8, 9, 10
The most additional points that Shen/Zhao would have received if the lift had been rated a Level 3 would have been +.5.
If Shen/Zhao had all fourteen elements -- they were one lift and one death spiral under the maximum/definition for well-rounded program; they added a Level 1 Front Inside Death Spiral and a Level 2 Group 4 lift to their CC LP -- they would have won even if they were slightly net negative on both elements. (More than -1 may have reflected in the program elements scores as more than the mandatory -.5 fall deduction in performance/execution.)
It seemed to me that
The Nutcracker program at SC was a work-in-progress. Even by Cup of China, the transition to the FIDS looked to me like they were remembering the change. But it must have done in Totmianina/Marinin's heads to know that a partially cooked program almost beat their well done (in the "medium rare"/"well done" sense) LP from last year. Even winning, there must have been a little twinge of, "S/Z were just doing a first run-through" at Skate Canada in the back of their minds.