The scores should have been close either way, but after watching the clearest video possible and taking the time to thoroughly examine the technical elements I'm quite upset with this result now. Sotnikova's footwork sequence had weak edges throughout the whole thing and really should not have gotten those crazy bonus marks for quality. Yu-Na Kim's footwork sequence was called as a Level 3 but I see no reason why it shouldn't have been called as a Level 4, after counting each and every step and rotation. Her execution of it was far better than what Sotnikova did as well.
That, combined with the underrotated jump Sotnikova didn't get called on AND the very bad PCS judging (I have to give Yu-Na extra credit for her speed in this performance and the sharpness of some of the arm movements I didn't get the full effect of in the previous video feeds), is just a ridiculous level of Russian bias.
Invalid turns. For example some skaters step out of loops or tuen out of them without a clean exit edge. Some hop turns. Some tuen off the wrong edge. Both kostner and Kim cut off loops among other things in footwork. Sotnikova didn't make the same error. She also gives herself a lot more chances to make up for mistakes since her sequence is overloaded with turns.
Again. People need to educate themselves. It muddies the discussion when people make statements that are wrong and present them as fact because they are not familiar with what the judges look for on elements like this.
Why so you think skaters have these 30 second footwork sequences. On skaters with shorter footwork I tend to look harder at the turns because they have less opportunity to make up for errors.
Oh please do! I can't do the slo mo myself, and it will be educational for us skating fans.
It's the Olympics after all.
)