- Joined
- May 29, 2018
I can see why the Yuna Kim example is a bit complicated (I’m also confused) but we can all understand what she means ; she wanted a coach that was used to training women and that’s all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, see, why didn‘t she do that then! How stupid of her not to ruin her chances of having both the Olympic gold and Olympic silver medal just to gain the reputation of being a „successful“ senior coach!Now we know why Zhenya said that to her: She was just worried for Eteri‘s reputation.
![]()
Wow, do you really think I'm dismissing Zhenya's performance? :ONow, this comparison only makes sense if we assume that Yuna in 2010 would also have won the gold if a 15-year-old Zagitova performing these exact same programs in the exact same manner would have lost to her. I don't think it's accurate at all to completely dismiss the 18-year-old Medvedeva's olympic performance simply because someone defeated her in that event.
How? Eteri only had Medvedeva and now that she and Tsurskaya are gone her oldest skater is Zagitova. Orser has trained two female skaters to an Olympic Gold Medal (even though, to be fair, Gabby‘s was only in the team event). Eteri doesn‘t want to train older skaters or she simply seems unable to as all skater sooner or later leave her (Lipnitskaya, Tsurskaya, Medvedeva). What‘s the problem with admitting the fact that Eteri simply focuses on junior skaters? She achieves great results with them, probably the best ever. But she just doesn‘t seem to be able to handle older skaters so far. But what‘s the problem? Everyone‘s got a speciality and with Eteri it‘s bringing the best out of young talents.
Wow, do you really think I'm dismissing Zhenya's performance? :O
I'm just stating facts here. Brian has coached a post-pubescent body to an Olympic gold. Eteri hasn't. As a woman, I can't tell you there's really not much difference between a 19 and 22 year-old bodies. Whereas the difference between 15 and 22 is massive. So it makes total sense to think that Brian's experience is more relevant to Zhenya's situation than Eteri's.
I don't understand what's do difficult to understand.
Can you really not see the problem with only focusing on the gold with this? Medvedeva, with a 18-year-old's body, did have quite a successful program. Clean skates, very well received internationally, very high scores(higher than Yuna's, mind). Someone being better... doesn't make her skate worse. If Medvedeva and Zagitova had performed the exact same programs, but say 2 Zagitova-favoring judges would have been different and became Medvedeva-favoring judges and Medvedeva would have won by 0.1 points rather than losing by 1 point, would the narrative of yours completely change? Even though the skating performances themselves would be perfectly identical? I don't get it. I agree though, 19 and 22 are closer than 18 and 22(insignificantly, but they're closer). But please don't go with "15 to 22", that's so forced.Wow, do you really think I'm dismissing Zhenya's performance? :O
I'm just stating facts here. Brian has coached a post-pubescent body to an Olympic gold. Eteri hasn't. As a woman, I can tell you there's really not much difference between a 19 and 22 year-old bodies. Whereas the difference between 15 and 22 is massive. So it makes total sense to think that Brian's experience is more relevant to Zhenya's situation than Eteri's.
I don't understand what's so difficult to understand.
and Orser? any names?EVERYONE knows that Eteri DOES NOT TRAIN OLDER SKATERS.
I do not understand the difference between 239.57 and 238.26 though. I mean, coaching a post pubescent lady to win silver with 238.26 while the gold medalist got 239.57 is suddenly a major difference from coaching a post pubescent lady to win gold.
Nops, no difference here, sorry to disappoint. Those achievements are on the same tier. I really fail to see the relevant difference in experience here.

So by your logic, Olympic Silver at 18 is an equal achievement to Olympic Gold at 19, based on a point differential 8 years in the future? Are we talking about the coaches here, or the skaters? I see there's no point in engaging in discussion about this. Don't worry, no one is disappointed, because no one is an arbiter of truth. Unless you count results as truth, in which case I see an OGM at 19 and an OSM at 18. And to these girls, that makes all the difference.
So by your logic, Olympic Silver at 18 is an equal achievement to Olympic Gold at 19, based on a point differential 8 years in the future? Are we talking about the coaches here, or the skaters? I see there's no point in engaging in discussion about this. Don't worry, no one is disappointed, because no one is an arbiter of truth. Unless you count results as truth, in which case I see an OGM at 19 and an OSM at 18. And to these girls, that makes all the difference.
Olympics aren't single skater simulators where you can say "This performance gets a gold medal, this gets a silver", etc. in a vacuum. It is always going to depend on the other contestants. Yes, it's perfectly possible for a silver medal performance to be better than a gold medal performance if said gold medal performance has weaker opposition(Speaking generally, not talking about anything in specific). Coaches do not have the power to decide results. Results are decided by what the skater does in relation to all the other skaters and what the judges score them by. The only thing a coach can impact is the skater's performance on the ice itself.So by your logic, Olympic Silver at 18 is an equal achievement to Olympic Gold at 19, based on a point differential 8 years in the future? Are we talking about the coaches here, or the skaters? I see there's no point in engaging in discussion about this. Don't worry, no one is disappointed, because no one is an arbiter of truth. Unless you count results as truth, in which case I see an OGM at 19 and an OSM at 18. And to these girls, that makes all the difference.
You're wording this very well. There are many understandable reasons(Atmosphere, environment, different types of specialists, want for a change, Orser's success with male skaters etc., wanting more freedom) but the reason given was one that didn't make a whole lot of sense to me.I don't actually see the salt...? Only finding it strange that she would mention Yuna in her interview, when she isn't the greatest example of Brian's ability to coach older skaters, since she left Brian straight after her first Olympics.
I can't speak for the others, but I think it's great that Evgenia has left Eteri - it'll give her a chance to develop a different style, try something new, and hopefully fix her technique. It's just that the interview is bizarre. Orser isn't demonstratively a better coach for older female skaters than Eteri, since neither of them have coached older female skaters (20+).
It seems that the salt here against Zhenya is because she didn't want to stick around to see if she could be Eteri's first successful adult skater. She made an assessment and did what she thought was best for herself. Unforgivable, right?![]()
Yep.
I don`t see any RELEVANT difference between coaching a 18 years old into winning an Olympic Silver (by 1 point margin), and coaching a 19 years old into winning an Olympic Gold.
We are talking about coaching here, and only coaching. Please tell me how those are so much different coaching wise.
Olympics aren't single skater simulators where you can say "This performance gets a gold medal, this gets a silver", etc. in a vacuum. It is always going to depend on the other contestants. Yes, it's perfectly possible for a silver medal performance to be better than a gold medal performance if said gold medal performance has weaker opposition(Speaking generally, not talking about anything in specific). Coaches do not have the power to decide results. Results are decided by what the skater does in relation to all the other skaters and what the judges score them by. The only thing a coach can impact is the skater's performance on the ice itself.
that's funny.
and Orser? any names?
Yuna 19.. almost the same age as Evgenia, and she left Orser after her first Olympic. Just like Evgenia left Eteri after her first Olympic.
Tursynbayeva 18, left him... no success
Gabby? He isn't her coach... and 15th place at OG.....
Joshi Helgesson? Alaine Chartrand ? that's even funny)
somebody also? Who? any names?
it's just one Yuna who is his first and only successful senior lady.