Please, look
at the first cascade 3Lz+3T. Firstly, her enter is simple, and I even say - little bit long (at least for exelent GOE), and she has an obviously awkward landing on the 3Lz, and on 3T - it's near 90 degrees UR. (see frame by frame, use pause and dot '.') Yes, it little less than 90, I admit, but still - this is a poor quality. Most judges gave for this +3 (one even +4). You are able to list the bullets, for what exactly is there to give such a GOE? I see only:
"very good height and very good length"
may be
"very good body position from take-off to landing"
if you say - "effortless throughout (including rhythm in Jump combination)", I said - seriosly? with that landing? And don't forget about - "Lacking rotation (no sign)" -1 to -2
For me this combo definitely no more than +1 may be +2. Noname would have been put +1, I'm just sure of that.
On
combo 3Lz+2T (with entrance through half rink again) I do not understand what is happening - there is definitely 3T and there is definitely UR (-2 to -3) on the lutz, (I dunno about 3T, I guess no UR). And step out (-3 to -4), but not huge, yes. So for me it must be:
3Lz<+3T(BV 8.92) with -1.77 GOE (it's -3, and I'm very kind). Total for this element 5.37. She had 6.82 for this. And I freakin like Canadian judge № 3, who gave +2. Yea, baby, let's rock this dance floor!
UR must be call on
3F in combo (again: pause, dot '.' and you will see everything yourself).
I completely agree with all the SDs that Anna received. But in this case, and Brady's jumps were to be judge strictly too, as it should. But they didn’t. So it was clown show, yes.