- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
Also no ultra-C elements! There are 27 Russian skaters better than the winner!Okay simmer down, Evgeni Tarasova.![]()

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also no ultra-C elements! There are 27 Russian skaters better than the winner!Okay simmer down, Evgeni Tarasova.![]()

And considerably more mechanical and boring, if the ones ranked enough to appear on youtube are anything to go by.Also no ultra-C elements! There are 27 Russian skaters better than the winner!![]()
So what? It's figure skating, not ice jumping. (there are no ultra-C in figure skating, this slang is really annoying)Also no ultra-C elements! There are 27 Russian skaters better than the winner!![]()
I know. I roll my eyes bigtime at the folks who think that for example, TaljegĂĄrd's FS last night was not 'good' because jumps were 'easy'.So what? It's figure skating, not ice jumping. (there are no ultra-C in figure skating, this slang is really annoying)
Switzerland have two spots for ladies, but their olympic committee has set a minimum score for them to go. I can't remember the exact score but it was around 180-185 and it needs to have been achieved within a certain time period (it might be the last year, but I'm not certain). Kimmy has the score from Worlds. Livia is a fair way off. It is why she has been doing so many competitions. I think she might have been better resting properly and then trying for it once healed, rather than competing while injured.Late to the party but I just watched the NBC cover of the event and when Livia Kaiser was on screen and everytime she fell or made a mistake the commentators kept mentioning that she would lose her Olympic spot. Maybe I’m under the wrong impression but dosent Switzerland have 2 Olympic spots for women? Kimmy is most likely going and Livia is the only next logical choice right? Is it something about not having the technical minimum?
yeah, I'd like to see those "jumps were easy" jumping on ice themselves - or even off iceI know. I roll my eyes bigtime at the folks who think that for example, TaljegĂĄrd's FS last night was not 'good' because jumps were 'easy'.
Yes, she qualified at last Worlds.Does Julia Sauter is qualified for the 2026 Olympic Games in Milano ? I read somewhere that she is qualified base on this european championship but I don't understand how this competition make her qualified for the Olympic ? Could someone help me to understand the situation ? Thank you.
I would say the opposite. Even Russian juniors at city championships have lovely elaborate costumes, and a lot of work put into choreography, into their lines, stretching, using their hands.And considerably more mechanical and boring, if the ones ranked enough to appear on youtube are anything to go by.
Given the long road she has traveled, this overwhelming performance came as a complete surprise... such a magnificent free skate, figure skating in its original meaning, a wonderful moment that will not be forgotten (I won't forget it, it was so beautiful it brought many, many tears to my eyes).Sauter: Lovely performance, she was v emotional afterwards. Good for her!
Yeah there is no 'reason' to watch an entertaining, gripping program like TaljegĂĄrds' or Sauter's, because it didn't have 3-axel or 3T-3TSo what? This was not only an event without an exceptional talent (of course someone like this does not appear every year), it was a down-to-earth event so far off from what is to be expected about 30 years after 3A and 3-3 combinations appeared in this discipline that there is no reason to watch it (contrary to a sprint that can be entertaining even without times under 9.90 (who are pointed out as "weak") this accident in slow motion lasts .. and lasts) - and certainly no reason to praise skaters as "wonderful" who cannot get an easy content together.
We don't need the political stuff.Tatiana Tarasova was griping about how there were only two clean programs.
Sis, I’d rather watch clean skaters than clean programs. Oop!
Yeah there is no 'reason' to watch an entertaining, gripping program like TaljegĂĄrds' or Sauter's, because it didn't have 3-axel or 3T-3TUnwatchable without that, like a 100m sprint where nobody runs under 9.9, level which sprinters reached 60 years ago.
Also, what is the 'good times' you compare it to? Many people seem to think Kim-Asada era was 'golden', but ECh of that era were overall technically weaker than today.