Which is one of the reasons why United should NOT have used physical force to remove a passenger from the flight.
It is United that should have used the (viable, but less preferable to anyone) alternative of ground transportation -- for its crew members to get to the destination.
United (at its own expense) simply would have had to make arrangements for a driver and vehicle to transport the crew members. Should have been a no-brainer.
United has been in damage-control mode (including apologizing to the passenger), so obviously United (in hindsight) believes that what it did was wrong.
I believe that United thinks what it did was wrong politically, but not morally. In their minds, a Pax refused to be bumped. Their manual says to let the police handle it,
because United has the legal high ground thanks to the deregulation of the US Airline industry. If there is any good to come out of this, it will be a national change of Policy.
If there is any bad to come out of this, it will be Delta issuing fake news that it will compensate THEIR customers up to $10,000 if they cant be given a seat. I got a nickel that
says their idea of "compensation" is these fake vouchers they want to hand out. I would like to see at a congressional hearing every one of those pax on that plane state exactly
why THEY didnt want to take $800 in vouchers.....and if the $800 would have been in $100 bills, like the old days, if they would have left the airplane.
I will not say the following in defense of United, but pressure for corporate profit in an unregulated airline industry with almost no competition means that every seat has to be filled and that
airplanes and crew have to arrive at the same place at the same time for a flight to get off the ground. One plane that breaks.....one crew that gets sick...upsets the apple cart. The apple cart
got tipped over for delta last week due to storms and computer failure and 4,000 flights had to be canceled. Thats 4,000 crews and 4,000 planes that didnt get to where they needed to be.
I dont know about you but I would much rather pay 10 percent more to have vacant seats on aircraft so that in changing conditions, crews and pax have some slack in the system, even using other
carriers. (Many here are too young to rememeber the days of yore, when people could camp out at the airport and fly standby. If a seat was available, they paid half price and everyone was happy.
We could do that again....kind of like an airline Uber....but what do I know? I am just an old pilot/mechanic....